This picture is when the game changed.

[dolfanerie]

Who the hell is our guy looking at replays? This is two weeks in a row! Wallace had a crucial catch versus the Bills and now this one. This one changed the game if you ask me.

 

[andyahs]

Philbin should have challenged but I doubt the play would have been overturned in that stadium. If a NE receiver had made that catch we would have seen 10 different angles with 2 TV timeouts.

 

[NBP81]

yeah I thought that was a catch too... so many fail in that game from the officials...

 

[dolfanerie]

Very true! They showed it once. If it was the other way it would of been on Sportscenter more than Rex Ryan and Peyton Manning.

 

[Shouright]

Good photo, but there's something to be said about a team when its fans believe that its games are hinging on what the referees do and don't do.

 

[VCU2000]

I don't think they showed a replay in the stadium from what the commentators said.

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk

 

[SB Dreamer]

Philbin should have challenged but I doubt the play would have been overturned in that stadium. If a NE receiver had made that catch we would have seen 10 different angles with 2 TV timeouts.

Not to mention it would have been a rule a "catch" on the field....

 

[andyahs]

Good photo, but there's something to be said about a team when its fans believe that its games are hinging on what the referees do and don't do.

That call was in Philbin's hands and he chose not to challenge.

 

[dolfanerie]

Good photo, but there's something to be said about a team when its fans believe that its games are hinging on what the referees do and don't do.

Thanks. I am not blaming the refs at all... Tough call to make in full speed... Our guy in the booth has to be on this! I did this before the punt! I was half in the bag and figured it out quickly.

 

[HarryBagpipe]

Game changed when Wallace dropped that pass near the end zone

 

[NCFINFAN13]

Good photo, but there's something to be said about a team when its fans believe that its games are hinging on what the referees do and don't do.

Get over yourself dude. You take away three or four of New England's top plays yesterday and they lose this game. But yeah, our team sucks from top to bottom.

 

[Shouright]

Game changed when Wallace dropped that pass near the end zone

Not really IMO, because if that drive had ended in a successful field goal, the Dolphins would've been up by three scores and more than 95% likely to win the game at that point. Instead, Tannehill was sacked for a nine-yard loss on the next play, and Sturgis had to attempt a longer FG, in the wind, because of it.

The sack was much more harmful than the dropped pass IMO, because even a run play for zero yards on the next down after the dropped pass would've probably kept the strong likelihood of a successful FG intact, which would've also kept the very strong likelihood of winning the game intact.

 

[HarryBagpipe]

Not really IMO, because if that drive had ended in a successful field goal, the Dolphins would've been up by three scores and more than 95% likely to win the game at that point. Instead, Tannehill was sacked for a nine-yard loss on the next play, and Sturgis had to attempt a longer FG, in the wind, because of it.

The sack was much more harmful than the dropped pass IMO, because even a run play for zero yards on the next down would've probably kept the strong likelihood of a successful FG intact, which would've also kept the very strong likelihood of winning the game intact.

So a sack that still gave us a makeable field game was a bigger factor than a would be touchdown that would of put us up 24-3? Seriously?

 

[NBP81]

Not really IMO, because if that drive had ended in a successful field goal, the Dolphins would've been up by three scores and more than 95% likely to win the game at that point. Instead, Tannehill was sacked for a nine-yard loss on the next play, and Sturgis had to attempt a longer FG, in the wind, because of it.

The sack was much more harmful than the dropped pass IMO, because even a run play for zero yards on the next down after the dropped pass would've probably kept the strong likelihood of a successful FG intact, which would've also kept the very strong likelihood of winning the game intact.

Yeah of course your going to pick tannehill's mistake over anyone elses... And If Wallace catches that pass, doesn't it make the field goal even more of a chip shot? You make no sense...

 

[Shouright]

So a sack that still gave us a makeable field game was a bigger factor than a would be touchdown that would of put us up 24-3? Seriously?

I'm sorry, I wasn't aware Wallace's miss was in the end zone. :unsure: