Too many possession WRs & other thoughts | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Too many possession WRs & other thoughts

LDaniel7

FinHeaven VIP
Club Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
4,009
Reaction score
460
Here's some thoughts related to tonight's game but not limited to it:

1. Huge issue: Too many possession WRs.

Look at the list of five that "everybody" sees as making the team: Ginn, Bess, Cam, Turner, Hartline

I disagree with that list, but those are the ones that 90 percent of posters think are "in." Huge problem: Look at that list -- 4 out of the 5 are possession WRs. Only one vertical WR in the whole group. Break it down:

  • Ginn -- complete package threat, killer speed, game breaker talent
  • Bess -- grocery getter, makes catches behind LOS and close to LOS, moves chains, dependable, but gets worse the further from LOS he plays, and poor red zone talent. Classic slot and possession WR. Makes a lot of catches in a dink and dunk offense that Penny specializes in
  • Cam -- classic possession WR, just a bit better than Bess downfield but not much, very average speed, no game breaker
  • Turner -- some potential as third down and red zone target, but a true possession WR, in no real sense a game breaker or vertical threat.
  • Hartline -- another grocery getter, Cam II type... a reason he was a fairly forgettable slot WR for Ohio, imo nothing special, could take Cam's place but a very average skilled WR, possession WR

Out of that group, the ONLY WR keeping the D honest is Ginn. In tactical terms, especially against good teams, this is a killer. ESPECIALLY if the QB doesn't have the arm to take full advantage of Ginn -- then it's roll and cover and sit down time: Running room like tonight w. Penny in there, a constricted field.

A huge tactical error if 4 out of 5 WRs on the roster are possession WRs.

Solution: Find a way to keep another WR that can keep D's honest. What if Ginn gets nicked or goes down? Bye bye season. Penny at QB with only possession WRs on the active roster? Laugh. See: Baltimore game redux against any good D.

2. Penny [this is nothing new] is a very limiting QB but has a great eye for the game. I get so aggravated watching Penny play & yet I also have to give him props for understanding the game. He clearly understands the game and feels it -- just can't make it happen like it should.

There's a reason the running game sucked w. Penny in there, imo.

And there's a reason why Ginn didn't have a long TD in that game. It's an old, old, old story: Ginn toasts a DB only to have to slow down for a pass that brings the DB back into the picture. Had Penny been able to throw the ball 8-10 more yards, the DB never would have touched Ginn: TD. No problem.

But it's the same thing every game. And people try to blame Ginn for running too fast or too far! lol. So funny.

That said, Penny is the starting QB. As frustrating as it is, he's still better than Henne.

Which brings up the next point:

3. Henne has a great arm but he is wooden as a QB in feeling the game, and TERRIBLE at locking on WRs, and poor at checking down to 2 and 3s, and not a quick release. As bad as Penny's arm is [the worst I've ever seen on a pro-QB], Henne is worse at locking on to primary WR. Henne would have multiple 3-pick games in a full season.

Henne has a GREAT arm but he's not gonna be a great QB anytime soon. Put Penny's head on Henne's body, then you have a QB!

4. Pat White. Yes, Pat White.

Pat White is a nice talent with latent game breaker potential. One thing that stood out to me was how quickly the ball got to the WR, without the big wind up [ala Henne]. White is a natural athlete with a good feel for the game. And his passes get there more quickly than Henne's [and much faster than Penny's], surprising the WR and contributing to at least two drops that I saw.

An innovative offensive game coach and QB coach spending time w. White will produce a player that's hard on defenses.

Confession: I was down on the White pick, mostly. But I'm starting to think he can play this game at a pro level -- and not as a slash, but as a QB. He's just a natural.

4. Jake "the great" Grove ain't all that, from what I saw. Admittedly not a good measurement for just partials in one game, but from all the talk I expected more. Same goes for the offensive line as a whole, with the exception of Thomas and Long.

5. Chris Williams is twice the talent of Hartline, imo. Way more upside and a potential game breaker. He needs to stay on this team as a KR/WR and I'd keep him over Hartline, burn the draft pick and keep the talent [or keep him over Cam]. I've never ever seen anything ultra exciting out of Hartline -- at Ohio State or on this level. But Williams showed me something tonight: he could be another WR that might keep the Ds honest, and an exciting return man.

Note: he's rough around the edges, definitely. But way more upside than Hartline, imo.

6. Anthony Armstrong didn't help his case tonight, with a hands of stone play. He has good speed, though. Some potential there, but raw.

7. Vontae Davis is as dumb as a box of rocks, but great football skills. He is flat dumb, I will say that... but I think he can grow into a good CB, better than average tackling and closing speed.

8. Jason Allen is probably better than Eric Green, at this point. Probably not saying too much, but still.

9. Phins still haven't been tested in spread. The D was at its worst tonight w. multiple WRs on the field... and this w. the Jags minus some good WRs and not great QBs.

10. Cameron Wake has an GREAT burst. This guy has an incredible upside, imo. There's not a lot to dislike about him... people are really gonna love him after he gets a season of playing and coaching under his belt. He could be a perennial pro-Bowl player 2-3 years from now, with Dwight Freeney potential.

11. Jason Taylor!

Ok, another confession: I was hard on JT, way hard on him his last prima dona year. But he still has game. IF he can keep it to this level for a whole year, avoid injury, it's gonna be great.

Just some flotsam and jetsam that I wanted to put out there.

Enjoy!

LD
 
Since Penny is still our QB, you dont need a bunch of speed guys, its hard as it is to get Penny to get Ginn the ball downfield, now imagine putting another speed guy out there and taking out a possession guy like Bess or Cam, our offense would be horrendous, thats the good thing about having a guy like Pennington, you dont need a bunch of speed guys.
 
I think your understanding of the word "tactical" isn't very full.

Keeping all those possession recievers on the roster would be a "strategic" mistake, as opposed to a tactical one. Tactics are the micro, strategy is the macro.
 
1 and 2 suggests a match made in heaven.. possession receivers are the best kind for limited arm strength but great poise and decision making QB. Maybe when we make the switch to a QB that can throw the ball down field more efficiently that could be a problem. Right now it isn't.
 
I think your understanding of the word "tactical" isn't very full.

Keeping all those possession recievers on the roster would be a "strategic" mistake, as opposed to a tactical one. Tactics are the micro, strategy is the macro.

Tactical relates to tools and methods used in strategy. Strategic relates to plan and implementation.

Because I was talking about roster and specific WRs, tactical is the right word.

In a sense, though, it is also a strategic mistake, without question. In that sense, I agree. I just don't agree that I don't know the difference, lol.

LD
 
1 and 2 suggests a match made in heaven.. possession receivers are the best kind for limited arm strength but great poise and decision making QB. Maybe when we make the switch to a QB that can throw the ball down field more efficiently that could be a problem. Right now it isn't.

I disagree that it isn't a problem "right now."

It is a problem right now -- it is. It's a huge problem imo, and it drives me bonkers to see it take place before my eyes every game: we suck at getting the ball down the field. We only have ONE WR that can get it done downfield, right now, on a consistent basis.

Yes, Penny has a weak arm. Weakest I've ever seen. BUT, it only makes it more difficult on him without true threats on both sides of the field. Penny is easily good enough to look off WRs and go to another side, if that option is also open downfield. This would only help him, imo.

His arm is weak but that isn't the whole problem, imo. I think it is a huge error to base an offense around a limitation. 4 of 5 WRs as possession WRs is a big mistake, both in strategy and tactics [Goonboss, lol].

LD
 
Since Penny is still our QB, you dont need a bunch of speed guys, its hard as it is to get Penny to get Ginn the ball downfield, now imagine putting another speed guy out there and taking out a possession guy like Bess or Cam, our offense would be horrendous, thats the good thing about having a guy like Pennington, you dont need a bunch of speed guys.

I'm not saying "a bunch of speed guys." All I'm really saying is that we dang sure need more than one.

We still would be able to have a Cam or Bess or Hartline or Turner underneath, depending on who makes it.

LD
 
Here's some thoughts related to tonight's game but not limited to it:

1. Huge issue: Too many possession WRs.

Look at the list of five that "everybody" sees as making the team: Ginn, Bess, Cam, Turner, Hartline

I disagree with that list, but those are the ones that 90 percent of posters think are "in." Huge problem: Look at that list -- 4 out of the 5 are possession WRs. Only one vertical WR in the whole group. Break it down:

  • Ginn -- complete package threat, killer speed, game breaker talent
  • Bess -- grocery getter, makes catches behind LOS and close to LOS, moves chains, dependable, but gets worse the further from LOS he plays, and poor red zone talent. Classic slot and possession WR. Makes a lot of catches in a dink and dunk offense that Penny specializes in
  • Cam -- classic possession WR, just a bit better than Bess downfield but not much, very average speed, no game breaker
  • Turner -- some potential as third down and red zone target, but a true possession WR, in no real sense a game breaker or vertical threat.
  • Hartline -- another grocery getter, Cam II type... a reason he was a fairly forgettable slot WR for Ohio, imo nothing special, could take Cam's place but a very average skilled WR, possession WR
Out of that group, the ONLY WR keeping the D honest is Ginn. In tactical terms, especially against good teams, this is a killer. ESPECIALLY if the QB doesn't have the arm to take full advantage of Ginn -- then it's roll and cover and sit down time: Running room like tonight w. Penny in there, a constricted field.

A huge tactical error if 4 out of 5 WRs on the roster are possession WRs.

Solution: Find a way to keep another WR that can keep D's honest. What if Ginn gets nicked or goes down? Bye bye season. Penny at QB with only possession WRs on the active roster? Laugh. See: Baltimore game redux against any good D.

2. Penny [this is nothing new] is a very limiting QB but has a great eye for the game. I get so aggravated watching Penny play & yet I also have to give him props for understanding the game. He clearly understands the game and feels it -- just can't make it happen like it should.

There's a reason the running game sucked w. Penny in there, imo.

And there's a reason why Ginn didn't have a long TD in that game. It's an old, old, old story: Ginn toasts a DB only to have to slow down for a pass that brings the DB back into the picture. Had Penny been able to throw the ball 8-10 more yards, the DB never would have touched Ginn: TD. No problem.

But it's the same thing every game. And people try to blame Ginn for running too fast or too far! lol. So funny.

That said, Penny is the starting QB. As frustrating as it is, he's still better than Henne.

Which brings up the next point:

3. Henne has a great arm but he is wooden as a QB in feeling the game, and TERRIBLE at locking on WRs, and poor at checking down to 2 and 3s, and not a quick release. As bad as Penny's arm is [the worst I've ever seen on a pro-QB], Henne is worse at locking on to primary WR. Henne would have multiple 3-pick games in a full season.

Henne has a GREAT arm but he's not gonna be a great QB anytime soon. Put Penny's head on Henne's body, then you have a QB!

4. Pat White. Yes, Pat White.

Pat White is a nice talent with latent game breaker potential. One thing that stood out to me was how quickly the ball got to the WR, without the big wind up [ala Henne]. White is a natural athlete with a good feel for the game. And his passes get there more quickly than Henne's [and much faster than Penny's], surprising the WR and contributing to at least two drops that I saw.

An innovative offensive game coach and QB coach spending time w. White will produce a player that's hard on defenses.

Confession: I was down on the White pick, mostly. But I'm starting to think he can play this game at a pro level -- and not as a slash, but as a QB. He's just a natural.

4. Jake "the great" Grove ain't all that, from what I saw. Admittedly not a good measurement for just partials in one game, but from all the talk I expected more. Same goes for the offensive line as a whole, with the exception of Thomas and Long.

5. Chris Williams is twice the talent of Hartline, imo. Way more upside and a potential game breaker. He needs to stay on this team as a KR/WR and I'd keep him over Hartline, burn the draft pick and keep the talent [or keep him over Cam]. I've never ever seen anything ultra exciting out of Hartline -- at Ohio State or on this level. But Williams showed me something tonight: he could be another WR that might keep the Ds honest, and an exciting return man.

Note: he's rough around the edges, definitely. But way more upside than Hartline, imo.

6. Anthony Armstrong didn't help his case tonight, with a hands of stone play. He has good speed, though. Some potential there, but raw.

7. Vontae Davis is as dumb as a box of rocks, but great football skills. He is flat dumb, I will say that... but I think he can grow into a good CB, better than average tackling and closing speed.

8. Jason Allen is probably better than Eric Green, at this point. Probably not saying too much, but still.

9. Phins still haven't been tested in spread. The D was at its worst tonight w. multiple WRs on the field... and this w. the Jags minus some good WRs and not great QBs.

10. Cameron Wake has an GREAT burst. This guy has an incredible upside, imo. There's not a lot to dislike about him... people are really gonna love him after he gets a season of playing and coaching under his belt. He could be a perennial pro-Bowl player 2-3 years from now, with Dwight Freeney potential.

11. Jason Taylor!

Ok, another confession: I was hard on JT, way hard on him his last prima dona year. But he still has game. IF he can keep it to this level for a whole year, avoid injury, it's gonna be great.

Just some flotsam and jetsam that I wanted to put out there.

Enjoy!

LD

Great post. I'm totally with you, except the mild sugggestion of possibly keeping Williams over Cam. Cam was our best WR last year, the go-to guy on 3rd down. Unless he's not recovered from injury (and it seems that he is), we shouldn't dream of getting rid of him. We can keep 6 receivers, or keep Williams over Hartline or Turner.
 
Great post. I'm totally with you, except the mild sugggestion of possibly keeping Williams over Cam. Cam was our best WR last year, the go-to guy on 3rd down. Unless he's not recovered from injury (and it seems that he is), we shouldn't dream of getting rid of him. We can keep 6 receivers, or keep Williams over Hartline or Turner.

The reason I mention keeping him over Cam is that Cam is the same player as Hartline, w. the exception that Hartline has a bit better speed. Right now Cam runs better routes, from what I see, but Hartline has the potential to be Cam II.

Turner is a different enough WR that he will have his place on the roster.

Williams brings another dimension to return game and potential killer packages inserted in offense -- a dimension that NONE of the WRs other than Ginn give the team. Hence, worth the risk.

It's taking a chance on greatness.

Last year ppl complained about the WR corps [including me] but how have we upgraded if we've just added the same ole' same ole' possession crap?

Do we really think NE or a great team would be happy with a roster full of possession WRs? lol. Nope. NE has 1-2, 3 gamebreakers lining up, with 3-4 slot Welker as a possession. Lightning all over the field.

Spread and kill.

Not Miami. Coaches keep picking possession WRs b/c Penny can't throw past 15 yards w. any mustard or accuracy, it seems. And this takes its toll against good teams.

Time to change the channel.

LD
 
I remember the Patriots winning Super Bowls with possession receivers.

As long as they fight for and hold onto the ball and ultimately move the chains... I don't care who they put out there.
 
I remember the Patriots winning Super Bowls with possession receivers.

As long as they fight for and hold onto the ball and ultimately move the chains... I don't care who they put out there.

You don't see the Patriots standing still there, do you? Nope.

Winners don't stay pat with a mediocre hand. They put the cards down and draw better ones.

Should be a lesson. If we go into the season with only one vertical threat, it will be the third year in row.

Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results.

Time to change the channel. Put some Chris Williams in there.

LD
 
You don't see the Patriots standing still there, do you? Nope.

Winners don't stay pat with a mediocre hand. They put the cards down and draw better ones.

Should be a lesson. If we go into the season with only one vertical threat, it will be the third year in row.

Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results.

Time to change the channel. Put some Chris Williams in there.

LD

Yea.. they brought in Moss and haven't won a SB since. I just don't believe the hype on sexy names and the suposed #1 receiver syndrome. I believe Welker led the team in receptions last year.. and maybe the year before. Tyrell Owens hasn't led anyone to a SB victory either.

To me a better player than either one is Steve Smith from Carolina. But it's also the play calls, the delivery of the pass etc..

The Pats have Brady.. that make all their receivers great.
 
there is a reason there is more "possesion" recievers in the nfl than "speed" recievers. speed only takes you so far in the nfl as a wr. if all you can do is run fast you are a little one dimensional. route runnning and creativity gets you more separation than just speed. its not like all wr are gadsden slow.

penny's arm is really the reason it looks like we have no deep threat. our wr all have solid speed and good quickness. we need redzone threats more than speed. we have no problem moving the ball down the field the problem comes when we get down to the goal line.
 
Yea.. they brought in Moss and haven't won a SB since. I just don't believe the hype on sexy names and the suposed #1 receiver syndrome. I believe Welker led the team in receptions last year.. and maybe the year before. Tyrell Owens hasn't led anyone to a SB victory either.

To me a better player than either one is Steve Smith from Carolina. But it's also the play calls, the delivery of the pass etc..

The Pats have Brady.. that make all their receivers great.

They didn't win the Super Bowl but they did win more games that year than any team in NFL history, as well as having a record-breaking offense. And while Welker could be productive in the slot anywhere, having Randy Moss take away half the defense surely aids him.
 
Here's some thoughts related to tonight's game but not limited to it:

1. Huge issue: Too many possession WRs.

Look at the list of five that "everybody" sees as making the team: Ginn, Bess, Cam, Turner, Hartline

I disagree with that list, but those are the ones that 90 percent of posters think are "in." Huge problem: Look at that list -- 4 out of the 5 are possession WRs. Only one vertical WR in the whole group. Break it down:

  • Ginn -- complete package threat, killer speed, game breaker talent
  • Bess -- grocery getter, makes catches behind LOS and close to LOS, moves chains, dependable, but gets worse the further from LOS he plays, and poor red zone talent. Classic slot and possession WR. Makes a lot of catches in a dink and dunk offense that Penny specializes in
  • Cam -- classic possession WR, just a bit better than Bess downfield but not much, very average speed, no game breaker
  • Turner -- some potential as third down and red zone target, but a true possession WR, in no real sense a game breaker or vertical threat.
  • Hartline -- another grocery getter, Cam II type... a reason he was a fairly forgettable slot WR for Ohio, imo nothing special, could take Cam's place but a very average skilled WR, possession WR
Out of that group, the ONLY WR keeping the D honest is Ginn. In tactical terms, especially against good teams, this is a killer. ESPECIALLY if the QB doesn't have the arm to take full advantage of Ginn -- then it's roll and cover and sit down time: Running room like tonight w. Penny in there, a constricted field.

A huge tactical error if 4 out of 5 WRs on the roster are possession WRs.

Solution: Find a way to keep another WR that can keep D's honest. What if Ginn gets nicked or goes down? Bye bye season. Penny at QB with only possession WRs on the active roster? Laugh. See: Baltimore game redux against any good D.

True, we have many possesion WR on our team. But look at what the Cards and did last year. Fitzgerald by no means is a burner. In fact Boldin and Fitz have very average speed. Both are more of possesion receiver type. The Cards have one speed guy and that is Breaston.

It is possible to have only one burner. Especially since we have Penny throwing the ball. I see no problem with having possesion receivers. Especially after watching Chambers drop so many passes in his days in a Phins jersey.

It is true we are limited a little by Penny's inability to throw the deep ball consistently, but I am even more worried about an inside rush threat. I think our inability to run the ball between the tackles poses an even bigger concern than our lack of "burners". We will be fine at WR. I no longer see WR as a major concern.
 
Back
Top Bottom