Top free agents to watch in 2006
- Thread starter Itsdahumidity
- Start date
Itsdahumidity
Pro Bowler
mods please merge this with my previous thread.
ItalianDolFan
☠️ Banned ☠️
id take Steve Hutchinson, Nate Clements, Reggie Wayne, and Julian Peterson.
I took them all 
but seriously we'll get Peterson if he leaves SF, Brees won't be available I expect SD to keep him and trade Philips. We might be able to bring in David Carr if the Texans dump him and he would be our future QB which would be good
but seriously we'll get Peterson if he leaves SF, Brees won't be available I expect SD to keep him and trade Philips. We might be able to bring in David Carr if the Texans dump him and he would be our future QB which would be goodItalianDolFan
☠️ Banned ☠️
i dont know if i support David Carr, he throws a lot of interceptions......well Dan Marino also threw a ****load of interceptions, but still....im 50/50 on Carr
if we were to get nate clements and reggie wayne our team would be so good.on defense clements and madison or daniels and then clements and madison can teach their ways to daniels and poole.then on offense reggie wayne would be a #1 reciever and chambers #2 reciever.Think how much better chambers could be no being a #2 reciever.We can just draft a QB.Screw brees
_dan24
wha?
dorsaroll156 said:
Reggie Wayne is NOT a #1 WR...
dominizzo
CAMERON EARTH WAKE
THe Hutch Wayne And Peterson
HugeFinFan
FinHeaven VIP
I'd die a happy man if the phins sign Julian Peterson. 
ray:
ray:Cutthroat
Scout Team
To hear talk around the Seattle area, Hutchinson is going nowhere. They plan to keep him around. There was a discussion on our local sportsradio station that the reason the Hawks promised Alexander that they would not franchise him again this year was because they knew they might need the tag for Hutchinson.
I would love to get him, but I am not going to count on it.
I would love to get him, but I am not going to count on it.
infiltrateib
TV Doctor
1. I know it's hard to be sure, but the smart money says Brees stays in SD. I'd give anyone here 5:1 on that. You just do not get rid of a young, proven QB who has been playing exceptionally well for 1.5 seasons in favor of an unproven rookie. The ONLY factor leaning in Rivers favor is his contract, but we're talking like 2 extra years. Yeah, Brees is going to cost a lot, but YOU DO NOT LET GO OF FRANCHISE QBs. EVER.
2. CBs are like QBs. They don't get away without a trade. I can't think of a single great CB (who was playing great when let go... not like Vincent who actually improved in Philly) who has been allowed to walk. Nate Clements is a gamer, no doubt about it. The Bills will CERTAINLY keep him or at least franchise and trade. I will give 5:1 on that too.
3. Peterson is a tough one. This is a Niners team that needs to rebuild, and he's in the 6th season. I really think with the lack of talent they have that they are a 4 year project. It's going to be a WHILE before they are competitive. Does Peterson fit into those plans? He's a versatile player and a lunchpail guy, but he'll be on his 10th season before they make really significant strides (in my opinion. They have a rookie QB who is going to take AT LEAST two years to pick it up... they have a terrible RB situation, one underrated but underperforming WR, an old DL, a young and bad secondary [minus Plummer] and a poor offensive line...). I'd give Peterson 50/50 on being let go, and then, given release, a 30% chance he comes here (which is pretty high, given the number of teams who will be interested... it's the Saban connection).
3. Rarely are good tackles let go, but guards are "made." You can pretty much be 320lbs, write into MTV and get a coach to "make" you into a starting guard in the NFL. Ok, maybe not, but whatevs, Hutchinson stays. Seattle snagged Walter Jones last season, and can now keep Alexander and Hutchinson. You put those three together, you run the ball. It's a core unit that is similar to what I'd like to happen here.
2. CBs are like QBs. They don't get away without a trade. I can't think of a single great CB (who was playing great when let go... not like Vincent who actually improved in Philly) who has been allowed to walk. Nate Clements is a gamer, no doubt about it. The Bills will CERTAINLY keep him or at least franchise and trade. I will give 5:1 on that too.
3. Peterson is a tough one. This is a Niners team that needs to rebuild, and he's in the 6th season. I really think with the lack of talent they have that they are a 4 year project. It's going to be a WHILE before they are competitive. Does Peterson fit into those plans? He's a versatile player and a lunchpail guy, but he'll be on his 10th season before they make really significant strides (in my opinion. They have a rookie QB who is going to take AT LEAST two years to pick it up... they have a terrible RB situation, one underrated but underperforming WR, an old DL, a young and bad secondary [minus Plummer] and a poor offensive line...). I'd give Peterson 50/50 on being let go, and then, given release, a 30% chance he comes here (which is pretty high, given the number of teams who will be interested... it's the Saban connection).
3. Rarely are good tackles let go, but guards are "made." You can pretty much be 320lbs, write into MTV and get a coach to "make" you into a starting guard in the NFL. Ok, maybe not, but whatevs, Hutchinson stays. Seattle snagged Walter Jones last season, and can now keep Alexander and Hutchinson. You put those three together, you run the ball. It's a core unit that is similar to what I'd like to happen here.
ASCII
FinHeaven VIP
_dan24 said:
I was wondering what a #2 reciever was doing on there, I thought we had one of those.
BrazForPhins
Perennial All-Pro
If I can pick 2 of those, it's Peterson and Hutchinson
Peterson would fill seau's gap and make our LB core sicckkkkk..imagine him along side zach and crowder(with 1 year under the belt)...so we could draft another LB late in the draft cause it won't be a huge need as it seems now.
Now Hutchinson is the master piece IMO. We could draft a stud LT and pick up Hutchinson. Imagine this line. McKinney would play like an all-pro with all this help around him. LT drafted, jeno james, mckinney, hutchinson, carey...UNDER HOUCK.
With the 2nd and 3rd picks we could draft a QB and a corner, not necessarily in this order. With the 4th saban could go WR or S..
Peterson would fill seau's gap and make our LB core sicckkkkk..imagine him along side zach and crowder(with 1 year under the belt)...so we could draft another LB late in the draft cause it won't be a huge need as it seems now.
Now Hutchinson is the master piece IMO. We could draft a stud LT and pick up Hutchinson. Imagine this line. McKinney would play like an all-pro
with all this help around him. LT drafted, jeno james, mckinney, hutchinson, carey...UNDER HOUCK.With the 2nd and 3rd picks we could draft a QB and a corner, not necessarily in this order. With the 4th saban could go WR or S..
Last edited by a moderator:
MiamiDolphins34
Active Roster
HugeFinFan said:I'd die a happy man if the phins sign Julian Peterson.
Same here.