Turnover Tannehill | Page 15 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Turnover Tannehill

Elle Clouds said:
He had a good game today absent the underthrows, pick 6 and near pick 6. Simple and plain I am pleased by his overall play today.. if you fanatics choose to read before responding to the thread, you would see that. I just hope he doesn't continue the trend of playing well and then playing bad. good win, go enjoy it!
Click to expand...

How about just go away. It would be a blessing to all of us. Critics like you are a dime a dozen, because it's easy to come on a message board anonymously and knock another man down rather than admit you were wrong or actually knowing anything about football. Tannehill made one mistake today but we also don't win without him. He's on pace for 4000 yds and 25+ tds with a makeshift o-line, a limited running game and no seam TE. That's amazing. When he does do it you'll probably come up with another lame argument. It's one thing to be a fool, it's another to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
 
Nawledge said:
Elle never knows what he's talking about
Click to expand...

I'm done... i say I like what I saw today absent a few mistakes and you non-readers choose to come in an hang on my testes... I'll go finish enjoying this victory while you guys learn to read or how to use a forum...
 
NCFINFAN13 said:
I like our WR's. We get Gibby back next year, and we're good.
Click to expand...

On a jest forum, a particular Sanchez fan was describing Keller's injury last season as "huge" in defending The Buttfumbler's lack of offensive help. (although it turns out that PFF rated their OL even with Hunter @#3 or #5(don't remember which). Well if he made a mediocre QB like Sanchez look at times decent, imagine him lining up on the other side of Clay and Gibby in the seam with Tanny throwing to them. With the emergence of Clay as a play-breaking all-league TE, I'm all the more sad at what could Yhave been with Keller and Gibson.

Props to the OL; in hindsight, Miss Martin did us a favor by compelling the trading for Mount McKinnie- as I pounted out before, for the defenders, it's the difference between Mt Everest and Petticoat Junction.

 
This staff is an improvement over the previous one.

Maybe the current staffs issues are; 1 ) Sherman's play calling is inconsistent & 2) Joe is so detail oriented that he can't improvise.

Seperately, they would be irritating. Together, it is what is holding the Phins back.
 
Elle Clouds said:
Learn to read before posting...damnt.... you guys are starting to remind me of Jet fans... I gave him praise today for his play but you guys seem to be so dense that you forget to read before posting..
Click to expand...

How about learn to watch the WHOLE game before posting your garbage. Maybe your mommy called you in for your crow dinner and you couldn't watch the end. How about this. When Tannehill does throw for 4000 and 25 tds you'll go away. Personally I'd love to see the mods ban you for some of your responses. Man up and eat your crow or go away.
 
you know what I find weird about this thread, you start it after our quarterback throws THREE touchdown and only one interception in a snow games.
 
Last edited:
Elle Clouds said:
I'm done... i say I like what I saw today absent a few mistakes and you non-readers choose to come in an hang on my testes... I'll go finish enjoying this victory while you guys learn to read or how to use a forum...
Click to expand...

Good riddance! Go take your clown act to the Jets board. You'll fit in great there. Interesting you mention your nads because I knew you weren't man enough to eat your crow. Mommy is calling! Buh bye
 
Elle Clouds said:
When it matters most, thats when he turns over the ball... and for a pick 6.. this kid has a knack for playing well, then playing bad... at times he looks good, then he reverts to this type of play... equals average in my eyes
Click to expand...

You made a very good point however...Troy made a BIG BOY play on that pick 6. Clearly the T-hill read was good BUT Troy's play was better of course I'd like to see my WR play BIG BOY ball and attack the DAMN ball and not wait on the ball. IMHO the Phinz really need a BIG WR that will attack the ball since they do not have one on the team currently. Also T-Hill has been playing pretty good IMHO, do not make the mistake of being a ball watcher, non-ball watchers can clearly see what T-Hill's got to work with, the Phinz OL is GARBAGE only the ball watchers can not see that, they have NO WR that can win 50-50 balls period, Clay runs hard - real hard - but he runs crap routes, Wallace CAN NOT adjust very when the ball is not directly at him and he NEVER wins 50-50 balls (I've NEVER been a big Wallace fan...I still think that he's a one trick pony and not a real #1), our OC is garbage why does he still has a job in the NFL, our RB's are small and can not pass block (plus they run crap routes) and last but not least our Phinz Def in the 4th (when it's winning time) is crap IMHO. Football is a team game and the Phinz just have too many weaknesses and issues (QB is NOT one of them IMHO)....IMHO da Phinz need 3-4 NEW offensive linemen (well everyone one but the C is garbage), 1 Big WR that can win 50-50 balls, 1 bell cow every down RB, get a damn FB, a 6-5 speed TE that can win 50-50 balls and BLOCK......oh well like I'm seeing too holes on O to fix and I do not think that our GM can make the right picks to fix the lack of OL, WR, RB and TE talent on offense :-(
 
Elle Clouds said:
I know some of you guys don't read before you post, but overall, I am pleased by his play today absent a few mistakes.. most of you are responding to posts from months ago thinking they were posted after today's win.. sheesh... learn to read please people. The game today was excellent and our whole team made big plays to win!!
Click to expand...

Pretty sure most of us who disagree with you are responding to this post quoted below from TODAY when you seriously jumped the gun as the truth is when it REALLY MATTERED MOST, Tannehill came through and we WON THE GAME!!

Elle Clouds said:
When it matters most, thats when he turns over the ball... and for a pick 6.. this kid has a knack for playing well, then playing bad... at times he looks good, then he reverts to this type of play... equals average in my eyes
Click to expand...
 
twohype said:
You made a very good point however...Troy made a BIG BOY play on that pick 6. Clearly the T-hill read was good BUT Troy's play was better of course I'd like to see my WR play BIG BOY ball and attack the DAMN ball and not wait on the ball. IMHO the Phinz really need a BIG WR that will attack the ball since they do not have one on the team currently. Also T-Hill has been playing pretty good IMHO, do not make the mistake of being a ball watcher, non-ball watchers can clearly see what T-Hill's got to work with, the Phinz OL is GARBAGE only the ball watchers can not see that, they have NO WR that can win 50-50 balls period, Clay runs hard - real hard - but he runs crap routes, Wallace CAN NOT adjust very when the ball is not directly at him and he NEVER wins 50-50 balls (I've NEVER been a big Wallace fan...I still think that he's a one trick pony and not a real #1), our OC is garbage why does he still has a job in the NFL, our RB's are small and can not pass block (plus they run crap routes) and last but not least our Phinz Def in the 4th (when it's winning time) is crap IMHO. Football is a team game and the Phinz just have too many weaknesses and issues (QB is NOT one of them IMHO)....IMHO da Phinz need 3-4 NEW offensive linemen (well everyone one but the C is garbage), 1 Big WR that can win 50-50 balls, 1 bell cow every down RB, get a damn FB, a 6-5 speed TE that can win 50-50 balls and BLOCK......oh well like I'm seeing too holes on O to fix and I do not think that our GM can make the right picks to fix the lack of OL, WR, RB and TE talent on offense :-(
Click to expand...

That wasn't a good read by Tannehill at all, and there was no room for the receiver to attack that play. I support Tannehill but that play was AWFUL and 100% on him, it's okay to not defend every little mistake he makes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom