Very average.

[tzjombie]

You know other then NE in the first game of the year we have not beat a really good team this year.

 

[Dthrill_08]

We scored 36 against the Broncos, we lost a close one to GB that has wiped the floor with everyone (except Vikings), Pats, beat Chargers 36-0, and almost beat the Lions.... Yes very average.

 

[tzjombie]

Wins: Buffalo, Oakland, SD, Chicago, Jacksonville, and NE.
Losse: Buffalo, KC, GB, DET, Den.

I don't care about how many points we won by all that counts is wins and losses and by those standards we are very average.

 

[Krateness]

Average is .500, we are above .500. Therefor we are above average...

 

[tzjombie]

By one game and when you factor quality of opponent we are very average. Don't get me wrong, I think we can be a very good team, well above average, however not with this coaching staff. (other then Lazor)

 

[MD]

By one game and when you factor quality of opponent we are very average. Don't get me wrong, I think we can be a very good team, well above average, however not with this coaching staff. (other then Lazor)

You said score doesn't matter just wins and loses. So how can you factor in opponent without factoring in performance?

 

[FinHopeful]

Wins: Buffalo, Oakland, SD, Chicago, Jacksonville, and NE.
Losse: Buffalo, KC, GB, DET, Den.

I don't care about how many points we won by all that counts is wins and losses and by those standards we are very average.

If this is truly how you analyze this team, then you miss an incredible amount of pride and joy in a growing team. Finally, a team with a future.

 

[CalDolFan10x14]

San Diego's not a good team? They're 7-4 and last I checked we whooped their asses.

 

[tzjombie]

Well I guess we will see at the end of the season. I should say we have above average players and below average coaching other than Lazor. I hope I wrong.