Well at least the rumor as reported by Jeff Darlington
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/31/vick-rumors-get-a-second-life/
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/31/vick-rumors-get-a-second-life/
Well at least the rumor as reported by Jeff Darlington
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/07/31/vick-rumors-get-a-second-life/
This bothers me in the same way the addition of Pat White is supposed to bother people.
It's that you HAVE to gameplan for it, whether or not they use it. Sure, it doesn't make much sense for the Pats to take the ball away from Brady. But the fact they have the option means you have to spend time planning for Vick - otherwise you'll look 38-13 silly like the Pats did the first time around with the WC. And the Pats' offense is pretty hard to gameplan against as it is.
The Pats are one of the highest scoring offenses in the league. Is the addition of Vick really going to increase their points per game?
Will his presence be a distraction, especially if some animal rights acitivists constantly protest outside their practice facility.
I hope so.
The Pats are an organization of very questionable character, so Vick fits right in.
Dosen't bother me one little bit.
If the Pats want to take Brady off the field for a portion of their plays against us it's a bonus. Ron Mexico NEVER lived up to expectations.