Viking Fan's Analysis of Brad Johnson's Play | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Viking Fan's Analysis of Brad Johnson's Play

Gardenhead

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 28, 2005
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
1
Location
New Orleans
Here is a little essay from the Viking Blog Pacifist Viking: http://pacifistviking.blogspot.com/

In Casablanca, when a woman asks Rick what kind of man the sleazy cop is, Rick replies, "He's like any man, only moreso." When it comes to calling for starting QBs to be benched, Viking fans are like any football fans, only moreso. But as Dick Vermeil would say, "They're right sometimes. More often than not, they're right."

In the last three weeks, the Vikings have gone 0-3 and scored 20 offensive points. Their quarterback has committed 8 turnovers in those three games.

Isn't that a serious problem in production?

The big defense of playing Brad Johnson is that he's a "smart veteran," that he "manages a game," that he "doesn't make stupid mistakes," that he "gives you a chance to win." But right now, Johnson isn't any of those things. He is an immobile quarterback without a strong arm, and he's committing turnovers. The offense is showing no creativity, and that's a problem too; however, Johnson just doesn't have the ability to make plays.

There's no reason to think of QB as a sacred position; benching a QB does not signal a cosmic shift. Players at other positions get benched, sometimes just for a few series. In the 40s, the Rams actually played two quarterbacks every game; future HOFer Bob Waterfield played the 1st and 3rd quarter, and future HOFer Norm VanBrocklin played the 2nd and 4th quarter. A quarterback can be benched, and when that quarterback is giving your team little production, lacks the skills to help your team, and is actually committing errors that hurt your team, he should be benched.

Whether you want to replace Brad Johnson with Brooks Bollinger or Tarvaris Jackson depends on your view of all sorts of things. But either would be better than Johnson right now.
 
The reason Brad Johnson can't be benched is because his backups are a rookie and BROOKS BOLLINGER, lol. Ah, Spielman...how we miss thee...
 
ckparrothead said:
The reason Brad Johnson can't be benched is because his backups are a rookie and BROOKS BOLLINGER, lol. Ah, Spielman...how we miss thee...

Exactly. Benching a QB is a bigger deal than benching any other player, and unless you're quite sure that whoever replaces him is better, it could be a huge mistake. Even if the QB is not currently playing at his best (see Tom Brady).

Having said that, if the Patsies wish to bench Brady for Cassell or "Greenballs", I'm all for it! :tongue:
 
DolFan Dan said:
Exactly. Benching a QB is a bigger deal than benching any other player, and unless you're quite sure that whoever replaces him is better, it could be a huge mistake. Even if the QB is not currently playing at his best (see Tom Brady).

Having said that, if the Patsies wish to bench Brady for Cassell or "Greenballs", I'm all for it! :tongue:

Also getting in the way here is ego. Brad Childress stepped on board and the first thing he did was trade an All Pro quarterback away because he insisted that Brad Johnson was better for the team. Now Brad Johnson has been exposed for the marginal player he is, and the team just has Brooks Bollinger and a project Tarvaris Jackson waiting in the wings. It's in Childress' best interest at this point to stick with BJ and pretend that the problems are not related to Johnson, that they made the right choice, etc.

Don't forget there are a lot of prominent players in that locker room that voiced their disagreement with trading Daunte. Bryant McKinnie, Pat Williams, Kevin Williams, Antoine Winfield, and Jermaine Wiggins chief among them.
 
ckparrothead said:
Also getting in the way here is ego. Brad Childress stepped on board and the first thing he did was trade an All Pro quarterback away because he insisted that Brad Johnson was better for the team. Now Brad Johnson has been exposed for the marginal player he is, and the team just has Brooks Bollinger and a project Tarvaris Jackson waiting in the wings. It's in Childress' best interest at this point to stick with BJ and pretend that the problems are not related to Johnson, that they made the right choice, etc.

Don't forget there are a lot of prominent players in that locker room that voiced their disagreement with trading Daunte. Bryant McKinnie, Pat Williams, Kevin Williams, Antoine Winfield, and Jermaine Wiggins chief among them.

I think you just opened the door for the rampage to come in and say that it's pride that forced Saban to start an injured Culpepper when we had superstars Joey Harrington and Cleo Lemon waiting in the wings.
 
emocomputerjock said:
I think you just opened the door for the rampage to come in and say that it's pride that forced Saban to start an injured Culpepper when we had superstars Joey Harrington and Cleo Lemon waiting in the wings.

Ummmm....ok.
 
ckparrothead said:
Ummmm....ok.

:D You know someone's going to say it before the thread is through, no matter how right or wrong it may be.
 
I think the difference between Saban and Childress is that Saban realized that Culpepper what hurting his team and did something about it.

Also, we didn't trade for Joey for fun. We knew there was a good possibility Daunte wouldn't be healed, so we got a decent QB (better the Bollinger).
 
For some reason though, Bollinger played pretty well against us last year. So, I'm not too keen on them benching Johnson in favor of Bollinger. Maybe Bollinger had the game of his life against us, but that game should have been a cake walk.
 
emocomputerjock said:
I think you just opened the door for the rampage to come in and say that it's pride that forced Saban to start an injured Culpepper when we had superstars Joey Harrington and Cleo Lemon waiting in the wings.

Since when is Cleo Lemon a superstar? Heck, Joey Harrington is only one because he got drafted high...
 
FrankP said:
Since when is Cleo Lemon a superstar? Heck, Joey Harrington is only one because he got drafted high...

Exactly :lol: There are a lot of people on the boards who will blame Saban for starting Culpepper at the beginning of the year, even though Culpepper stated that he was healthy and ready to play, as did the team doctors. Saban, as well as any other coach, will play the guy who gives him the best shot at victory. As there are folks who insist that Joey is the quarterback of the future for the Dolphins, there's bound to be someone who blames Saban for not putting him in at the first of the season so that he could have saved us from the dire predicament we're in.
 
Those poor Vikes fans spewing trash about glad to have Brad and good to see DC go. It came back and bit them in the arse! Good to see!

I'm also happy that Childress is having a rough go, something about him gives me a bad vibe especially his handling of DC. So I'm happy to see him fail as well.

I like Johnson, but I don't think he is better than DC. After next week, they can win all the games they want/can, more power to them.
 
Gardenhead said:
I think the difference between Saban and Childress is that Saban realized that Culpepper what hurting his team and did something about it.

Also, we didn't trade for Joey for fun. We knew there was a good possibility Daunte wouldn't be healed, so we got a decent QB (better the Bollinger).

Actually Saban realized that Culpepper was hurting Culpepper, and did something about it. He's repeatedly said it had everything to do with his fear for Culpepper's well being and nothing to do with winning.
 
ckparrothead said:
The reason Brad Johnson can't be benched is because his backups are a rookie and BROOKS BOLLINGER, lol. Ah, Spielman...how we miss thee...

Ah yes, let me count the ways...........uh............................?
 
Back
Top Bottom