Vintage Miami Wr's

[cafinfan408]

If you could add one of these guys when they were in their prime who would you add to our current stable.

 

[phinfan33]

i'd go with Nat Moore myself...yeah the Marks Brothers were great and had fantastic chemistry with Marino,and they complimented each other well,but i'd still go with Moore...i just think he was a better overall WR...btw cafinfan408...witch is spelled which for the way you asked that question...

 

[The Furminister]

Paul Warfield, Hall of Famer, end of question.

 

[emeraldfin]

Could'nt go wrong with any of them.

But if I had to chose, Warfield.

 

[marinotoclayton]

Personally I went with Clayton I think he had more agility and better hands than Duper. Duper had probably more speed than Clayton. But Clayton was the better all around receiver. As far as Moore is concerned he was pretty much done for until Marino came along. Marino gave him new life so to speak.

And sorry but I never really seen to much of Warfield. But as far as he goes he probably woyuld be my second choice. Hard list to choose if you ask me.

 

[acmeanvil49]

Mark Clayton from ................. LOUISVILLE!

 

[ciscoholgate]

In todays game of high powered offenses I would have to go with Clayton for the fact that he played in a similar offense. No doubt the fact that he had Marino throwing to him helped.

Any of the four would be a good choice. I also would have liked to see Warfield play in todays no bumping rules. I bet he could have dominated, but we'll never know.

 

[Tigers2003]

i'd go with Nat Moore myself...yeah the Marks Brothers were great and had fantastic chemistry with Marino,and they complimented each other well,but i'd still go with Moore...i just think he was a better overall WR...btw cafinfan408...witch is spelled which for the way you asked that question...

I would take them all if it was possible. To me it is a toss up between Warfield and Moore. Moore was underrated. He did everything well but was not freakishly superior at anything. Good speed, good route running, dependable hands. He would be the safe bet as far as consistency.

 

[marinotoclayton]

I would take them all if it was possible. To me it is a toss up between Warfield and Moore. Moore was underrated. He did everything well but was not freakishly superior at anything. Good speed, good route running, dependable hands. He would be the safe bet as far as consistency.

yes he did have good hands . That hit where he did the helicopter spin in a Jets game was awsome.

 

[Dolphins7273]

Paul Warfield while he was in his prime with Cleveland.

 

[G-Force]

O.J. McDuffie?

 

[cafinfan408]

Would you really wanna add McDuffie to our current group though?

 

[3Ply Stagliano]

I picked Clayton without having seen much footage of Warfield. Had I seen more of Warfield, my pick may have been different.

 

[Smith21]

warfield went to the h.o.f. so im assuming he was elite... i never saw him play but i picked him

 

[Lorenzo Rules]

I would take these 5 guys to our wr corp if they were in their prime.

@#1 Paul Warfield
@#2 Nat Moore
@#3 Mark Clayton
@#4 Chris Chambers over O.J. Mcduffie because Chambers was a victim of too many oc.'s and too many qbs