Was Williams Re-signed To Be Trade Bait? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Was Williams Re-signed To Be Trade Bait?

Vaark

They call me Speedo but my real name is Mr Earl
Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
38,727
Reaction score
61,998
Location
Beam Me Up Outa Here!
Seems we don't need him or Parker as 4th WRs are not that hard to find.

Was this the plan all along knowing we were going after Hill (someone somewhere here or on Twitter rumored that the Fins were working on something "Big") ?

If so, what kind of pick could we get for someone who really hasn't been all that healthy or productive?
 
Seems we don't need him or Parker as 4th WRs are not that hard to find.

Was this the plan all along knowing we were going after Hill (someone somewhere here or on Twitter rumored that the Fins were working on something "Big") ?

If so, what kind of pick could we get for someone who really hasn't been all that healthy or productive?
Huh? You’re a smarter poster than this. He has zero value. He gets picked up for nothing after he gets cut
 
I see a bidding war now. Who is giving the the best bag of used balls?
 
Williams' was re-signed, but even at that point his contract is structured to suggest he wasn't a lock to make the 53 man roster. He'll compete for a job, but unless there are injuries or if Parker is traded ad they just want to keep one big body wr on the roster it doesn't look good for his chances.
 
pretty sure parker is gone.
Not sure... depends on what teams are offering. If the best offer is a 6th round pick, like the Rams got for Robert Woods, I would just hold on to him for another year. His deal is cheap and there would be no real savings in cutting him.
 
Yeah I personally don’t see Parker having a ton of trade value either. Maybe a late rounder but also wouldn’t shock me if we tried to do right by him and just straight up released him letting pick his own team
 
🤣🤣🤣

Nah lol

We had 0 idea T.Hill was a thing, they would've never signed that.

Probably wouldn'tve signed C Wilson either honestly
 
I'm struggling to make sense of this proposition.........
 
Back
Top Bottom