Washington is going to have a qb problem...would it be reasonable to inquire | Page 6 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Washington is going to have a qb problem...would it be reasonable to inquire

Gonzo said:
Sorry, all the excuses have made me start to miss them when I'm reading them (or not reading them, I guess).

Most wanted to see big improvement and instead have gotten regression. But it's only 3 games and there has been a ton of [insert excuse here]. That's neither here nor there though, the current topic of this thread is bashing Cousins for one terrible game.
Click to expand...

Tannehill would kill to have one game like Cousins did last week. I think Cousins past 2 weeks are the perfect examples of "Ceiling" and "Floor" as a player. You've seen him at his best, and at his worst in a short prep week. He'll be down the middle, but nowhere near as bad as this game. It's an outlier.
 
Tannenballs said:
Tannehill would kill to have one game like Cousins did last week. I think Cousins past 2 weeks are the perfect examples of "Ceiling" and "Floor" as a player. You've seen him at his best, and at his worst in a short prep week. He'll be down the middle, but nowhere near as bad as this game. It's an outlier.
Click to expand...

I already provided an example of tannehill playing great. he also played great vs the cardinals his rookie year. so tannehill has show a high ceiling. what he hasn't shown, is his floor to be as low as cousins...
 
Tannenballs said:
Because he doesn't have one very good game in those 3 starts. Cousins might have played the game of his life last week and never come close to that again. But Tannehill has played at best 3 average games in the new offense. No one can honestly say he has played good in any 3 of those games. Tannehill also has about 31 more NFL starts than Cousins.
Click to expand...

So what exactly is a b minus by your own grade scale...been a long time since I have been in college but c was average...so he must have played better than that to you...that's why the whole grade thing means nothing to me...evaluate it for what it is save the grade stuff always my take...

Tannehills also at no point ever looked like cousins did tonight In a game...
 
hooshoops said:
So what exactly is a b minus by your own grade scale...been a long time since I have been in college but c was average...so he must have played better than that to you...that's why the whole grade thing means nothing to me...evaluate it for what it is save the grade stuff always my take...

Tannehills also at no point ever looked like cousins did tonight In a game...
Click to expand...

Above average. B - is not good. If you were calculating a GPA, a B= 3 points. a B- =2.7 points. a C+ would be 2.3 points. So Tannehill played above average against the Bills. And I'm working on a bunch of college film now so I don't feel like breaking down the Chiefs game. Even though you did agree with over 90% of my viewpoints on that tape..
 
truedolfan57 said:
I already provided an example of tannehill playing great. he also played great vs the cardinals his rookie year. so tannehill has show a high ceiling. what he hasn't shown, is his floor to be as low as cousins...
Click to expand...

Not sure what you would consider as low as Cousin. He didn't have a 4INT game. Fine. But I am not sure if there is much of a difference between a 1TD 4INT game and a 1TD 3INT game especially if the stats are similar and the end result (loss). Tannehill had 2 games like that last year with the absolute worst statistics against the Jets. Remember that game at home fighting for a playoff spot?

Or how about 0TDs and 3INTs? Year 1 twice.

I sure hope that is as low of a ceiling as it can get.
 
phins_4_ever said:
Not sure what you would consider as low as Cousin. He didn't have a 4INT game. Fine. But I am not sure if there is much of a difference between a 1TD 4INT game and a 1TD 3INT game especially if the stats are similar and the end result (loss). Tannehill had 2 games like that last year with the absolute worst statistics against the Jets. Remember that game at home fighting for a playoff spot?

Or how about 0TDs and 3INTs? Year 1 twice.

I sure hope that is as low of a ceiling as it can get.
Click to expand...

Cousin's ceiling game resulted in a loss...
 
hooshoops said:
So what exactly is a b minus by your own grade scale...been a long time since I have been in college but c was average...so he must have played better than that to you...that's why the whole grade thing means nothing to me...evaluate it for what it is save the grade stuff always my take...

Tannehills also at no point ever looked like cousins did tonight In a game...
Click to expand...

Not even against the jests or the Saints last year?
 
phins_4_ever said:
Not sure what you would consider as low as Cousin. He didn't have a 4INT game. Fine. But I am not sure if there is much of a difference between a 1TD 4INT game and a 1TD 3INT game especially if the stats are similar and the end result (loss). Tannehill had 2 games like that last year with the absolute worst statistics against the Jets. Remember that game at home fighting for a playoff spot?

Or how about 0TDs and 3INTs? Year 1 twice.

I sure hope that is as low of a ceiling as it can get.
Click to expand...

you are right, tannehill has had some stinkers. not denying that. some pretty bad games. and as bad as 0-3 td-int and 1-3 are bad. they still aren't as bad as 1-4. and I can't remember all of tannehills picks, but I remember a lot being tipped. all of cousins int's tonight were all on cousins, if I recall right. i'd have to watch that again to make sure.

---------- Post added at 12:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 AM ----------
Tannenballs said:
Did Tannehill win when he had a lot of passing yards against the Cardinals and Colts in 2012?
Click to expand...

no...but then why do you say tannehill has never had a game like cousins, when he clearly has.
 
truedolfan57 said:
and who said he was?
Click to expand...

So your point was...

---------- Post added at 10:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:22 PM ----------
truedolfan57 said:
you are right, tannehill has had some stinkers. not denying that. some pretty bad games. and as bad as 0-3 td-int and 1-3 are bad. they still aren't as bad as 1-4. and I can't remember all of tannehills picks, but I remember a lot being tipped. all of cousins int's tonight were all on cousins, if I recall right. i'd have to watch that again to make sure.

---------- Post added at 12:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:20 AM ----------



no...but then why do you say tannehill has never had a game like cousins, when he clearly has.
Click to expand...

"I think I can make excuses for those games, but will need to double check."
 
Gonzo said:
So your point was...
Click to expand...

I stated my point. might have been in the other thread talking about cousins. it's too soon to tell if he's better than tannehill.

---------- Post added at 12:25 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:24 AM ----------
Gonzo said:
"I think I can make excuses for those games, but will need to double check."
Click to expand...

"I can't think of anything else to say, so I will just say "excuses""
 
truedolfan57 said:
Cousin's ceiling game resulted in a loss...
Click to expand...

We are talking about low ceiling....so I thought. Now we are moving the bar again. What is it with you people?
OK. Cousins good performance they lost. Fine. Bonus point for you. Not sure what your point is though. They also scored 34 points. Please feel free to blame Cousin for the loss. If you want to use that game to discredit Cousin and lift Tannehill's status please do so. Whatever makes you feel better.

BTW against Jacksonville they scored 41 point with Cousin at QB. I am looking really hard right now to find a Tannehill led offense scoring 41 points in three years. Can't seem to find it. Can you help me?

Honestly we can do that all day. But you have to keep moving the bar.
 
phins_4_ever said:
We are talking about low ceiling....so I thought. Now we are moving the bar again. What is it with you people?
OK. Cousins good performance they lost. Fine. Bonus point for you. Not sure what your point is though. They also scored 34 points. Please feel free to blame Cousin for the loss. If you want to use that game to discredit Cousin and lift Tannehill's status please do so. Whatever makes you feel better.

BTW against Jacksonville they scored 41 point with Cousin at QB. I am looking really hard right now to find a Tannehill led offense scoring 41 points in three years. Can't seem to find it. Can you help me?

Honestly we can do that all day. But you have to keep moving the bar.
Click to expand...

truedolfan57 said:
I stated my point. might have been in the other thread talking about cousins. it's too soon to tell if he's better than tannehill.
Click to expand...


.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom