Casas9425
Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 5,933
- Reaction score
- 4,133
Since the May 3 session ended, the Dolphins have shown anything but a desire to be constructive, at least regarding public dialogue about what happened to its bill in the Florida House. And the portion of its fans or the general public who are utterly clueless about how the Legislature works are all stirred up by the Dolphins-spread myth that Weatherford killed the bill.
That's an exaggeration. The Dolphins bill stalled in the House.
First: it never was put on the agenda in the House budget committee by Chairman Seth McKeel. The budget committee was its last committee stop. Technically, under legislative process, that's a major killer.
Second: a similar measure that passed the Senate cleared that chamber too late in the session to make it easy to take up in the last week in the House without a two-thirds vote. I said as much in this column and repeatedly indicated in blog posts and on Twitter that the Dolphins' had problems. I was ignored. Had the bill arrived in time (on Monday before about 5 p.m. in this case) the House Rules Committee could have put it on the agenda to be voted on. It didn't. The rules committee, chaired by Rep. Rob Schenck could have made a special effort to agenda the bill "if received" by the Senate. But it didn't. So blame Schenck, too, as well as Dolphins-opposing members of his committee like future speakers Richard Corcoran and Jose Oliva.
Third: Oliva is a good example of the real nexus of opposition: Miami-Dade's Republican delegation in the House. A majority opposed the Dolphins bill. Why? Perhaps because, under the structure of representative government, they held the office most-close to constituents in the Legislature and realized that the people of Miami-Dade didn't want this (cf. the results last night). And they were stirring up opposition among other Republicans of the Florida House, where the GOP has a majority. The ring leaders: Carlos Trujillo, Michael Bileca and Jose Javier Rodriguez (who's a Democrat).
sounds like Weatherford feeding the Miami Herald damage control.
I am not a fan of the stadium plan, but that doesn't mean I am impressed by Weatherford. There's a logical disconnect to say "I didn't allow the vote to take place, and see I was right, it lost anyway." There are two issues. The Dolphins were willing to take their chances with the voters. The House didn't let that happen. It's that the house did not let the voters decide their own fate that the Dolphins are griping about. To say "see the voters didn't like the plan" breaks the chain of logic.
Hopefully, the stadium will decay further to the point that repair will be impossible, and Miami won't get any major events. Then the public will help build a new stadium by around 2020. That will be a win-win for Dolphin fans who want a more significant home field advantage. Propping up that old stadium in that awful location would have just been bad news all around.
I don't know who Marc Caputo is, and frankly I don't care. It does not vindicate Weatherford at all. Actually, IMHO, it makes his actions look even worse. If it was going to fail anyway, and the Dolphins organization was paying for it, why not let it continue? It smells of dirty politics and assuming that the early returns were going to be the final results is a joke.
I have no proof of this but it SEEMS the Marlins did everything the wrong way and got their stadium. Dolphins did everything right and got shut out. If the Dolphins had played dirty, maybe they would've gotten their stadium.
I seem to remember that there were some commissioners in Miami who were against Marlins ballpark, had a meeting with the Marlins that night, and the next day their minds were changed. Wonder what happened in that meeting.. :err: