What are you: Team Martin or Team Incognito | Page 8 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

What are you: Team Martin or Team Incognito

Which team do you side with?

  • Total voters
    375
cltchperf said:
Classy guy you are. That's sad. If this was Brandon Marshall vs Johnathan Martin, you;d probalby root for a past girlfriend beater too right? And root for Adam Pacman jones too eh? Sorry guys like Richie, pacman, etc are scumbags, but it's nice knowing people can side with scumbags more than wusses. So you side with a scumbags..wow. I'm not saying Martin is innocent, he's an idiot, but even with martin's issues, you'll never find me siding with anyone who's a scumbag over an wussy idiot. I'm going to be against both guys. It just shows your character that's all.
Click to expand...

I'd love to have 11 Brandon Marshalls, 11 Incognitos, 11 Bryan Cox's compared to a (1) Jonathan Martin.
 
GoonBoss said:
I'm fine with my character. You can side with ******* and snitches all you like. I'm absolutely fine with where I am as a person, a man, and a father. I will NEVER
side with weakness. Actions have consequence, and whatever actions you take, you have to live with for the rest of your life. I don't endorse one thing by supporting
one person. The argument is bigger than that, or can't you grasp that?

---------- Post added at 04:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:27 AM ----------



There are still those men in the NFL, but society are a bunch of *******, who just want stats.
Click to expand...

You are endorsing something by supporting a scumbag over a snitch. So let me see, if you have a son and he sexually harasses a girl, you just going to be "oh well, boy's will be boy's"? You don't have to side with weakness. I never said I sided with Martin. Is it that hard to not side with Martin, yet also not side with a scumbag? You make it like it's either one way or the other, which is stupid. I'm for Miami dolphins, and not a particular player. You said you hate snitches, but can you not be against both guys? Really it's not that hard. I'm not on Martin's side over richies. No mattter what a wuss I think Martin is, I can't bring myself to side with a scumbag over Martin just because Martin is a snitch, but instead, be against both guys. So Team NEITHER. That's not hard to grasp right? Why is it hard for you to grasp that? And have a tie for a scumbag, when you can be against both guys?, when both are in the wrong. Incognito is an idiot for leaving a vm, joke or not. he's a moron and I don;t feel sorry for him nor can I side for him. He dug his own grave and Martin's a snitch too. both are at fault.
 
cltchperf said:
You are endorsing something by supporting a scumbag over a snitch. So let me see, if you have a son and he sexually harasses a girl, you just going to be "oh well, boy's will be boy's"? You don't have to side with weakness. I never said I sided with Martin. Is it that hard to not side with Martin, yet also not side with a scumbag? You make it like it's either one way or the other, which is stupid. I'm for Miami dolphins, and not a particular player. You said you hate snitches, but can you not be against both guys? Really it's not that hard. I'm not on Martin's side over richies. No mattter what a wuss I think Martin is, I can't bring myself to side with a scumbag over Martin just because Martin is a snitch, but instead, be against both guys. So Team NEITHER. That's not hard to grasp right? Why is it hard for you to grasp that? And have a tie for a scumbag, when you can be against both guys?, when both are in the wrong. Incognito is an idiot for leaving a vm, joke or not. he's a moron and I don;t feel sorry for him nor can I side for him. He dug his own grave and Martin's a snitch too. both are at fault.
Click to expand...
I'm advocating strength over weakness.

If there is to be one, rather than the other, I chose the one.

Do you understand that?
 
dolphans1 said:
I'd love to have 11 Brandon Marshalls, 11 Incognitos, 11 Bryan Cox's compared to a (1) Jonathan Martin.
Click to expand...

You can want them on your team because of their talent over other players as I realize the nfl has quite a bith of thugs on many teams. But it's another thing to side with a player whose a punk like thos guys over something like this. I may like what Brandon Marshall can do to help my team, but I'll never personally be a fan of him therefore, not side with him if he ever had a similar case like the johnathan martin one here. Which is why I can't side with a guy like Richie, and instead be against both guys.

---------- Post added at 03:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:40 AM ----------
GoonBoss said:
I'm advocating strength over weakness.

If there is to be one, rather than the other, I chose the one.

Do you understand that?
Click to expand...

They're both weak... end of story.
 
cltchperf said:
You can want them on your team because of their talent over other players as I realize the nfl has quite a bith of thugs on many teams. But it's another thing to side with a player whose a punk like thos guys over something like this. I may like what Brandon Marshall can do to help my team, but I'll never personally be a fan of him therefore, not side with him if he ever had a similar case like the johnathan martin one here. Which is why I can't side with a guy like Richie, and instead be against both guys.

---------- Post added at 03:40 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:40 AM ----------



They're both weak... end of story.
Click to expand...

End of YOUR story. Not the rest of us, or me.
Quite frankly, I'm glad it's the end of your story.
 
GoonBoss said:
End of YOUR story. Not the rest of us, or me.
Quite frankly, I'm glad it's the end of your story.
Click to expand...

Yeah sticking or pressing a golf club to a woman's hoo ha, show's strength there. What a guy. It's one thing to have another about a player's talent etc about the game, its disturbing for people to side with a guy or brush it off because he didn't snitch, but violating women or other guy's who beat women, etc and rather side with such guys.

Icognito is not a sign of strength, guys who do that, are weak too and not real men. He's not much of man either, just like Martin isn't.
 
cltchperf said:
Yeah sticking or pressing a golf club to a woman's hoo ha, show's strength there. What a guy. It's one thing to have another about a player's talent etc about the game, its disturbing for people to side with a guy or brush it off because he didn't snitch, but violating women or other guy's who beat women, etc and rather side with such guys.
Click to expand...

I thought it was the end of your story. I see it's not.
 
I wonder if the player that quit was lamar thomas or dion jordan..... if people would still be on Incognitos side...
 
GoonBoss said:
I'm fine with my character. You can side with ******* and snitches all you like. I'm absolutely fine with where I am as a person, a man, and a father. I will NEVER side with weakness. Actions have consequence, and whatever actions you take, you have to live with for the rest of your life. I don't endorse one thing by supporting one person. The argument is bigger than that, or can't you grasp that?
Click to expand...

I have read a lot of your posts over the years (done some serious lurking) I would be interested in hearing your take on the bigger argument. Right now I understand you to say regardless of the situation you always support strength. Doesn't that at times put you at odds with societal norms and ethics? Doesn't the strength argument lead to support of totalitarianism? There really are no circumstances where calling on the authorities i.e. snitching is OK? When you refer to strength and weakness is this simply on a physical level, if so does this mean that men’s superior strength over women affords them rights? Might always means Right?
 
ED AminJoeGreen said:
I have read a lot of your posts over the years (done some serious lurking) I would be interested in hearing your take on the bigger argument. Right now I understand you to say regardless of the situation you always support strength. Doesn't that at times put you at odds with societal norms and ethics? Doesn't the strength argument lead to support of totalitarianism? There really are no circumstances where calling on the authorities i.e. snitching is OK? When you refer to strength and weakness is this simply on a physical level, if so does this mean that men’s superior strength over women affords them rights? Might always means Right?
Click to expand...

You ask lots of good questions for a dude that has a play on words handle that brings to mind a former African dictator.
I'm not sure who's troll account this is.
 
I was hoping the Avatar Pic would be a give away to a younger generation, name came to me in a dream. I will be glad to move along.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom