What game was the refs watchin?? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

What game was the refs watchin??

FiN FaN KeViN

Practice Squad
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Age
35
Location
Okeechobee, FL
clearly we got screwed today by the refs like on the pass interfernce call on travis daniels it was bs. and we should of had a few cause those new england defenders where holdin are wide recivers. but o well we had 4 downs and couldent make it 7 yards.:shakeno:
 
FiN FaN KeViN said:
clearly we got screwed today by the refs like on the pass interfernce call on travis daniels it was bs. and we should of had a few cause those new england defenders where holdin are wide recivers. but o well we had 4 downs and couldent make it 7 yards.:shakeno:
While I disagree with your opinion of the call. He did hold the WR arm.

What I hate is that the NFL thinks its a good penalty to give a team 50 yards for a non intentional penalty. No way should there be a 50 yard penalty unless the DB simply tackles the WR to prevent the TD.
 
it was close but i dont think it was a pass interference i was right there in sec 129 row 25 so seen it up close though i guess u have to be n.e. to get away with any pently like that.
 
it was a close call. I dont have a problem with that one as much as i do on the non call on the new england defender with his forarm all up in gus' face. I bet if that was JT on Brady it would have been called.
 
its interference by the letter of the law, but considering the position daniels had, i dont think you call it. the WR really had no shot at the ball

daniels could have easily intercepted that pass.

i also agree that there should be two levels of pass interference like in college
 
Whats amazing is how the Pats CB's didnt have one pass interferance all accept for bruschi's which was questionable.
 
FiN FaN KeViN said:
it was close but i dont think it was a pass interference i was right there in sec 129 row 25 so seen it up close though i guess u have to be n.e. to get away with any pently like that.


That was pass interference. Daniels grabbed his arm twice.
 
The one against Danials should have offset, since the reciever grabed him to prevent him from intercepting the ball. The one that really pissed me off was the noncall on the PA against Chambers in the first. There was no excuse for not calling that
 
I didn't get to see the game, but it sounds like the usual preferential star treatment. The team that's supposed to win catches the breaks. Jordan pushing off of Bryon Russell, anyone?
 
PassRush said:
The one against Danials should have offset, since the reciever grabed him to prevent him from intercepting the ball. The one that really pissed me off was the noncall on the PA against Chambers in the first. There was no excuse for not calling that

the one where he was tackled before the ball got there?
 
I wouldn't say tackled but the defender was definatly over the back and clearly pushing Chambers before the ball was even in arms reach
 
FiN FaN KeViN said:
clearly we got screwed today by the refs like on the pass interfernce call on travis daniels it was bs. and we should of had a few cause those new england defenders where holdin are wide recivers. but o well we had 4 downs and couldent make it 7 yards.:shakeno:

I agree. It was marginal contact that can't be called in a close game. The WR definitely had a chance to make a play and didn't. It reminds me of the BS pass interference call a few years ago in New England. They got the ball deep in our terrority and scored. I think we outplayed New England, but that PI call and the turnovers killed us.
 
Back
Top Bottom