I don't agree. I believe that they are indeed talking to Crowder about an extension. This is just part of good negociations.
Ireland said it himself that talks won't heat up until after the Combines and right before FA.
Lowballing is just a good negociations tactic. It is a way to lower expectations to the client and then finally come to some type of compromise.
Crowder would probably be the best bargain compared to Dansby and Scott.
If you listen to Dansby on the radio, he is just using us and New York as a tactic to bring his price up for ARI. But he is actually interested in re-signing with them.
Same thing with Crowder. He mentioned what he did about getting a STs offer as a means of scaring Parcells and Co. into upping their offer.
Not saying that Crowder will definitely be MIA's starting MLB in 2009. But its not impossible.
Crowder showed this season that he has the ability, potential, and talent to duplicate whatever numbers Scott and Dansby put up.
In fact, Crowder had better numbers than Scott did this season.
So Crowder, who is still young, has his best season in front of him. So just wait. He will put up a season similiar to what Dansby put up this year, in a year or so.
Just give Crowder a stud NT to play behind and you'll see.
Dansby had seasons in his first few seasons where he didn't put up the numbers that Crowder put up this year. So he isn't such an upgrade over Crowder the way many on this forum are making it out to be.
Crowder has as much talent as Scott and Dansby have. They will cost much "more" than Crowder would. So look for Parcells and Co. to attempt to re-sign Crowder after talks pick back up and heat up, like Ireland said at the Senior Bowl.
MIA's priority list probably looks like this: #1) Vernon Carey #2) Yeremiah Bell #3) Channing Crowder #4) Andre Goodman #5) Renaldo Hill.
Why? Because if you look at the draft, where is the best value based on where we draft? FS, CB, G/C, and WR are the best value players pertaining to pick #25. The top 2 ILBs should be gone by pick #25.
Also, even if one of them dropped to pick #25 (which is playing rushing roulette anyways) and we used our pick on a MLB, we risk losing out on the value of quality that pick #25 has at FS, CB, G/C, or WR.
I left out OLB because I feel that what is going to be available at OLB at pick #25 is not that big a difference from what will be available at pick #44 at OLB. So it probably makes more sense to fill another need with a player that is higher rated at his respective position at #25 and wait for the 2nd round to add another OLB (kind of like we did last year by passing on Matt Ryan to fill our LT need and waiting for the 2nd round for a Chad Henne, who they probably felt was not that much different in talent than what Ryan offered)
Now of course if someone ranked higher drops that is an OLB then of course, you take him.
And also, Cam Wake could play a role in waiting to pick another OLB til later in the draft rather than have to pick one at #25. Because whatever will be available at pick #25 at OLB may not be that much better than Wake, if at all....
You can always wait for later in the draft for depth.
Now if Parcells feels that Scott would be a harder hitter and goes after him...he is still risking losing out on a bidding war. But hey, we'll see.