JTech194
Starter
Looking at several teams this year compared to last year, I've come to the conclusion that making decisions based on year to year play and results may not be the best way to build a consistently winning organization. There are several teams that were not good last year an are pretty good this year (so far)
1. Jags 3-13 last year 7-4 this year
2. Eagles 7-9 last year - 10-1 this year
3. Vikings Vikings 8-8 last year 9-2 this year
4. Saints 7-9 last year - 8-3 this year
5. Rams 4-12 last year - 8-3 this year
6. Panthers 6-10 Last year 8-3 this year
Or were good last year and not very good this year (So far)
1. Cowboys -13-3 last year to 5-6 this year
2. Giants 11-5 last year to 2-9 this year
3. Raiders - 11-5 to 5-6
4. Dolphins 10-6 last year to 4-7 This year
5. Broncos - 9-7 last year 3-8 this year
What this suggests (at least to me) is that much more focus should be applied to SELF SCOUTING as opposed to looking at wins and losses to determine what moves to make. This makes upper management's job extremely difficult because they are tasked with identifying what changes need to be made.
1. Are we not winning because the players are bad? Slow, weak, lack of work ethic, lack of talent etc...
2. Are we not winning because the coaches are bad? Poor schemes, poor practices, poor player management etc..
And this is probably the most difficult to decipher ..... Do the players look bad because the coaching is bad or do the coaches look bad because the players are bad?
Is it possible that The dolphins fell victim to looking at the Results of last season as opposed to really self scouting to determine if they were on the right path.... Yes we won 10 games and made the playoffs, but did that mean we were on the right track from a player talent standpoint. Did Stills, Branch, Kiko, etc... do enough
1. Jags 3-13 last year 7-4 this year
2. Eagles 7-9 last year - 10-1 this year
3. Vikings Vikings 8-8 last year 9-2 this year
4. Saints 7-9 last year - 8-3 this year
5. Rams 4-12 last year - 8-3 this year
6. Panthers 6-10 Last year 8-3 this year
Or were good last year and not very good this year (So far)
1. Cowboys -13-3 last year to 5-6 this year
2. Giants 11-5 last year to 2-9 this year
3. Raiders - 11-5 to 5-6
4. Dolphins 10-6 last year to 4-7 This year
5. Broncos - 9-7 last year 3-8 this year
What this suggests (at least to me) is that much more focus should be applied to SELF SCOUTING as opposed to looking at wins and losses to determine what moves to make. This makes upper management's job extremely difficult because they are tasked with identifying what changes need to be made.
1. Are we not winning because the players are bad? Slow, weak, lack of work ethic, lack of talent etc...
2. Are we not winning because the coaches are bad? Poor schemes, poor practices, poor player management etc..
And this is probably the most difficult to decipher ..... Do the players look bad because the coaching is bad or do the coaches look bad because the players are bad?
Is it possible that The dolphins fell victim to looking at the Results of last season as opposed to really self scouting to determine if they were on the right path.... Yes we won 10 games and made the playoffs, but did that mean we were on the right track from a player talent standpoint. Did Stills, Branch, Kiko, etc... do enough