Nick is God said::shakeno:
And it continues....
Tell me the good teams each has beaten? Show me the quality wins?
Nick is God said::shakeno:
And it continues....
Alex44 said:I dont see how ANYONE thinks the Big East is a good conference
The teams they played out of conference have an average record of 4-7 and they just beat up on eachother within conference.
I think Rutgers belongs in the top 10 and ahead of all the two loss teams, but I cant say I think they are a top 5 team
Nick is God said:Wow, never mind man, if you don't think WVU is not that good, I honestly don't know what to tell ya.
It's a shame people continually to knock the Big East like this, it is what is all wrong with College football today.
:shakeno: the big east is a BCS conference!!! i don't get how people think the big east is SOOO inferior to every other conference. are they weaker? YES. are they THAT much weaker? NO. they have great coaching throughout the conference, which means they can get really good recruits, which means they can play with ANYone in the country.MoFinz said:but dont tell me a 10-0 Division III team is better than a 2-6 Purdue team, simply because they are undefeated doesnt tell the whole story.
MoFinz said:Opinions are like corvettes, every A-hole gets one. You can disagree with me all you like, but much like 10 years ago when Major Harris led the mountaineers to an undefeated regular season only to get their butts handed to them in the bowl game, records are fine, but dont tell me a 10-0 Division III team is better than a 2-6 Purdue team, simply because they are undefeated doesnt tell the whole story.
MoFinz said:I dont expect you to understand, and never have i said i didnt think Rutgers UL and WVU arent fine teams with fine stories. They just arent as battle tested as a SEC or Big10 team
Nick is God said:Oh geez, that's rich.....:sidelol:
Me understand?? Your the one comparing RU to a Division III team, enough said there.
MoFinz said:See. i told you you wouldnt understand. I compared the perfect season, not the teams. But thanks for trying anyway
MoFinz said:Fine then, i'll take your logic to the next step then.....
Boise State 12-0
Vs.
Rutgers 12-0
For the 2006 National Title.
Yeah.....thats the 2 best in the nation, because they both went 12-0 and qualified for BCS games.
Seriously....think that through before you repost. You can no more disqualify Boise State if they win out than you can Rutgers. But youre going to tell me theyre the 2 best teams in the country?
Puhleeeze
MoFinz said:See. i told you you wouldnt understand. I compared the perfect season, not the teams. But thanks for trying anyway
Fine then, i'll take your logic to the next step then.....
Boise State 12-0
Vs.
Rutgers 12-0
For the 2006 National Title.
Yeah.....thats the 2 best in the nation, because they both went 12-0 and qualified for BCS games.
Seriously....think that through before you repost. You can no more disqualify Boise State if they win out than you can Rutgers. But youre going to tell me theyre the 2 best teams in the country?
Puhleeeze
burger13 said:Big East = BCS Conference
WAC = Mid-major Conferene
But I'm sure you don't see a difference there.
I'm not sayint that Rutgers SHOULD be in the NC game yet.....but I will always argue with those who pretend to know they do't belong already.
UTenn over Cal...oh well, you tried at leastNukulus said:What teams have the top teams in the SEC played OOC? Thats right no one. They have no quality wins out of conference either. They just all beat up on each other. Right? So whats different between the Top SEC teams losing to others in the SEC (and still being really good and more deserving of their rankings than Beast teams) and Top Big East Teams losing to Top Big east teams?
Cuban Dave 9 said:UTenn over Cal...oh well, you tried at least
Yeah you're right...A potential USC win over Cal shouldn't be a quality win.MikeO said:If Cal loses to USC, then they have 3 losses and how quality are they?