which of the 7 picks taken ahead of Tannehill are doing better than him?

[JayCee]

Stop going off his rep. Have you seen him play? It isn't pretty since losing Wayne.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I don't have to go off his rep. The dude is a stud! You obviously have NOT seen him play if you are basing it off his performances since Wayne went down. That is ridiculous!

 

[J. David Wannyheimer]

lol im sorry but please click following link
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categoryst...erence=AFC&role=TM&season=2013&seasonType=REG
44 sacks compared to 23 for colts?
nearly DOUBLE more sacks given up but their OL is about the same as ours?

First, Andrew Luck is amazing at escaping sacks. You saw Tannehill make some great plays today to avoid sacks? Luck does that every week.

Second, our pass protection improved tremendously once Jon Martin went out of the lineup.

 

[Nawledge]

I don't have to go off his rep. The dude is a stud! You obviously have NOT seen him play if you are basing it off his performances since Wayne went down. That is ridiculous!

since luck is so great shouldn't he be making everyone around him better? I mean that's what the morons around here use to bash tannegill

 

[Patrick_Bateman]

we had no shot at the guys ahead of him, the question is how many players taken after him are doing better?

exactly

 

[phinfan13]

while i dont think tannehill is a bust, its clear to me he'll never be great. I think his ceiling is top 15 qb

Which is exactly what the scouts and analysts said of him. But this franchise has been using the "most of the analysts are wrong" approach for too long when it comes to drafting amongst other things.

 

[SCLSU Mud Dogs]

Tannehill is not the answer. Face it Fin Fans.

Are you seriously high? What about that game makes you think that Tannehill has to go? He was basically the only part of our offense that works well.

 

[JCane]

lol im sorry but please click following link
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categoryst...erence=AFC&role=TM&season=2013&seasonType=REG
44 sacks compared to 23 for colts?
nearly DOUBLE more sacks given up but their OL is about the same as ours?

Uh oh.

This guy needs stats and box scores to tell him who is good and who isn't because his poorly trained eyeballs fail him.

Fantasy football has ruined a once intelligent football fan base.

 

[J. David Wannyheimer]

Are you seriously high? What about that game makes you think that Tannehill has to go? He was basically the only part of our offense that works well.

Hartline and Wallace played well today, too.

 

[Nawledge]

Are you seriously high? What about that game makes you think that Tannehill has to go? He was basically the only part of our offense that works well.

he has an agenda...he makes it very clear

---------- Post added at 07:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 PM ----------

Are you seriously high? What about that game makes you think that Tannehill has to go? He was basically the only part of our offense that works well.

he has an agenda...he makes it very clear

 

[JCane]

I don't have to go off his rep. The dude is a stud! You obviously have NOT seen him play if you are basing it off his performances since Wayne went down. That is ridiculous!

It's pretty incredible that the Colts asked Luck to step into Peyton's Manning's shoes and throw throw throw because they have no run game or offensive line. RGIII and Russell Wilson had offensive molded to fit their style because they're so limited as a true QB.

The fact that he has only been sacked the number of times he has is equally phenomenal. The guy is the master of evading defensive pressure.

 

[Phantom]

You are not serious or you are not smart.

Would Matt Stafford make you guys happy? They're a .500 club who just lost to TB. How about Luck who got drilled by AZ and has been up and down this year? Kapernick who was called a "remedial" passer by Dilfer. Wilson who leads qbs in fumbles? Romo? Rivers? The dumber Manning? Lots of skilled players out there on teams that are mediocre (Seattle is real good). I mean what would it take for you guys to be happy?

I know...you guys all thought we should have gone O line and got Foles a round or two later. B frickin S.

It's sarcasm, for the people who point to a head to head win, to make their point about which qb is better.

 

[Keonxl]

Your going to sit there and say Andrew suck is losing to the cardinals, when we sit here and lose to the likes of tampa bay. Yeah Andrew luck sucks all right, he only took his team to the playoffs last year and will be again this year and also broke many a record in his rookie season. Tannehill is doing ok, but to compare him to luck at this point is insane. When Tannehill leads the dolphins to the playoffs and has more td's then interceptions in a season, then we will compare the two.

 

[SCLSU Mud Dogs]

Hartline and Wallace played well today, too.

Yeah, when given the opportunities. Tannehill has to put the offense on his back for it to move absolutely anywhere.

 

[Keonxl]

Five years? Are you serious? So we should have just drafted weeden then. If it takes 5 years to learn anything, then maybe you should change professions.

 

[JCane]

Five years? Are you serious? So we should have just drafted weeden then. If it takes 5 years to learn anything, then maybe you should change professions.

Especially when the NFL slants the rules in tremendous favor of the QB.

Average guys are coming in and blowing up the league due to rule changes that benefit offenses.