Which player can we not afford to lose to injury?

[xSxPxHx]

Been thinking about this one, I honestly think it's Hill.

*Knocking on wood*

At first I was thinking Armstead, but Tua is getting the ball off really fast. If Hill goes down then they double team Waddle and who picks up the slack? I think it's Hill.

**CORRECTION BESIDES TUA** I was even thinking Tua since we all know.

 

[danstilldaman]

That's a pretty easy answer, it's already been proven in this season. Tyreek would be a huge loss but Tua is the clear answer imo.

 

[Gsmack_42]

Easy Tua been there done that.

 

[1972forever]

Tua. They can’t win without Tua in the lineup. Especially with the fact the defense has played so poorly this season.

Hill and Waddle are the next two players they can’t afford to lose to injury.

 

[Martel13]

#1

 

[WaddleWaddle]

1. Tua
2. Armstead
3. Hill
4. Waddle

 

[xSxPxHx]

Imagine Tua wins the MVP award? Some people would have a meltdown here...up in here

 

[AdamD13]

In order of …

Tua
Tyreek
Holland
Williams
Wilkins

 

[Atila]

We seriously cannot afford any more starters to go down… we actually need to start getting guys like Ajax and Byron Jones BACK!

 

[TrojanMAAAAN]

Did you mean besides Tua? Because he's clearly the obvious choice.

 

[E30M3]

Wilson should be able to pick up enough slack should Waddle or Hill go down. We don't recover from losing Tua. I would say the lynchpin is really giving Tua more than a second to throw and that is Armstead.

 

[superphin]

Jason Sanders.

 

[GRYPHONK]

Tua

After Tua, C. Williams IMO.

I believe losing our center, this year, would hurt our offense more than losing Armstead.

Just my opinion though

 

[Danny]

why was this even a question ?.....unless the OP meant other than Tua

 

[Tuaffinity and Beyond]

Why would you even bring this out there? You really had to give thought to this? Did you not see the three weeks without Tua. Cmon man!