Who is/will be the better Running Back?
Good poll. It's a question that's been on my mind a lot lately.
I like Ronnie. No problem with him being our starter at this point, although it's also fair to say he's in the "to be determined" category compared to other established backs that have been in the league longer. But I don't find him necessarily as
instinctive as I would like, given a choice. That was one of the minor criticisms of him coming out of Auburn.
A.P., to me, seems more instinctive. Until our OL is in the top ten of the league, I think a more instinctive back has the advantage over any other kind. Someone to make something out of nothing--which is where Ricky currently beats Ronnie, IMO. Ronnie's hands as a receiver and A.P.'s injury history bring this debate closer to a dead heat for me.
I voted for A. P. That's with my head, not my heart.
For all we know, Cam and Mueller are sitting back discussing draft scenarios, and one says to the other, "Ya know, Peterson reminds me an awful lot of L.T." And the other says, "I was about to say that." Regardless of how good Ronnie is, that's all it would take, besides a slip of about 5-6 spots, for Peterson to be a Dolphin a month from now.
There are some Dolphins I like more than others, and as I said I have no problem with Ronnie whatsoever. But it ultimately comes down to who you think might help the Dolphins the most.
Of course, I'd like to have both of them in 2007 to further investigate this issue. :D Considering the success of the teams around the league that employ two quality RBs, this isn't as absurd as it may sound. Look at N.O., for example. Duece & Reggie Bush? A lot of people felt they couldn't afford that luxury because they were coming off a bad year (& a monumental hurricane disaster), but when the picks fell as they did, they had the footballs to make the right choice.
PS - I am aware of both the purpose and function of an offensive line. I'm further well aware of our quality and quantity shortfall in that department.
But IMO, round one should always be for BPA. Treat yourself to the best player possible at any position in the first round, and fill your needs as best as you can in rounds 2-7 and with undrafted free agents, where the value of BPA and position of need can swing back and forth wildly depending on who's still available.
Again, great poll. Interesting to see what FH members think about it.