Who would you start vs the Raiders? | Page 8 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Who would you start vs the Raiders?

Who would you start vs the Raiders?

  • Ryan Tannehill

    Votes: 109 63.4%

  • Matt Moore

    Votes: 63 36.6%
  • Total voters
    172
  • Poll closed .
I have a thought on why Tannehill does not run. What if he did get hurt while doing so? Moore would come in, and he may do very well. So well, that he may start the next game, and the next one....
 
Tannehill...because watching the meltdown on the forum is so entertaining.
 
MegaFinz said:
Tannehill, but if he struggles first half with the same old bull**** I yank his ass and put in Moore.
Click to expand...

Everone on our team seems to struggle in the first half. That's on Joe for game planning. Can we bench Philbin and start Lazor?
 
Funny that a poll of mostly out of town fans is reversed from local fans. 73% down here want Moore to start. I assume a lot of the 73% actually go to the games and saw what I saw. Open receivers on almost every play.

Edit: and the Miami Herald poll favors Tannehills benching with 67%
 
Awsi Dooger said:
Who cares about starting? I'd like to witness a conversation about London between Moore and Tannehill. See if Tannehill knows one damn thing about the city. Everybody tried to dismiss the fact that Tannehill didn't know the divisions. Incredible. We drafted a dullard to play quarterback. It's painful to watch his press conferences on the 5th Quarter shows. I'm not saying it's everything but it darn sure should be part of the evaluation process. Dion Jordan has perfected the blank expression with sunken eyes. I'm never confident he knows where he is.
Click to expand...

(Tannehill and Moore arrive at their hotel in London. Moore has been trying to get Tannehill to show any signs of intelligence...)

Moore: "OK Ryan, here's a softball for ya... What current NFL Quarterback shares a nickname with a famous London landmark?"

Tannehill (laughs): "Haha, that's easy... Broadway Joe!"

Moore: "Honestly, if I tried for weeks, I could not arrive at a more incorrect response."

Tannehill (picking nose): "C'mon, don't feel so bad, you'll get one right one of these days."

Moore: (shakes head in disgust)

Tannehill: "What's the matter? Hungry? Let's take a stroll down Broadway and find a place to eat!"
 
I think you start Tannehill, just to see how he responds to the criticism he is receiving now . . . however you certainly can't be loyal to him anymore. The whole idea that "he gets 3 full years" just isn't the right philosophy to have. Matt Moore honestly seems like the better fit at QB at the current time, based on the type of play we need at the QB position. He's more decisive, he's more accurate, he has a better touch on the deep ball and he is also mobile.
 
WVDolphan said:
You want to hear another stupid argument the Tannehill apologists and Matt Moore haters love...............

They argue that if Moore were better he wouldnt be sitting the bench because our coaches see the QBs everyday and they KNOW that Moore sucks.

Well arent we talking about the same coaches that they claim do not have a clue?

When it comes to apologizing for Tannehill, the coaches are always idiots who cost us games. But, when it comes time to say why Moore shouldnt start, all of the sudden those same coaches become GENIUSES who would never have the better player on the bench.

That is the same kind of logic liberals use.
Click to expand...

Save that crap for the politics forum. Few people take your football opinions seriously around here anymore. What makes you think anybody gives a **** about your politics?
 
Tannehill. If at some point in the game he is ineffective then make a change. I want to win the Raider game. The QB that can deliver that is my guy! I have been a Tannehill guy and I know it's growing pains with the new offense but I want to win the Raider game. Check egos, win the damn game and pull to 2-2 at the by. Work really hard for 2 weeks and come out of the by looking like the team we thought they would be. I love the young talent, we've got some offensive weapons that have to get going but Moreno will be back soon and that is huge news. His injury set us back big time but credit Miller for filling in great vs KC. This passing game has flatlined. That's on Lasor to get corrected. Hopefully, we beat up on the Raiders. We really need a big win!
 
This is the perfect game for RT to get some confidence which he is clearly lacking right now, Oakland started the season flying to NY then a home game then last week flying to Boston and now flying to London....this team will have no legs.....RT should get fat off these guys and hopefully gets him on the right track.....if he loses this game then I say you make the switch at the bye and give Moore a chance to save the season.....
 
phins_4_ever said:
Funny that a poll of mostly out of town fans is reversed from local fans. 73% down here want Moore to start. I assume a lot of the 73% actually go to the games and saw what I saw. Open receivers on almost every play.

Edit: and the Miami Herald poll favors Tannehills benching with 67%
Click to expand...
Its a weak argument. You can go to any game watch any QB play and find open WR's on every play. And yes I was at the game.

Opinions are skewed locally probably because the Miami fan base are front runners.
 
I don't care enough to watch anymore. Wake me up when everyone is fired. I'm watching the Seahawks game next week. Or something else.
 
phinman1 said:
Maybe he resigned w Miami bc he knew Tannehill would suck and that he would eventually get the starting nod.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that has to be it. Tannehill set a record for most yards by a rookie before being rest by Luck, and Tannehill with no true talent around him as a Rookie helped Miami be competitive in most of the games they played his Rookie year, but Moore still expected him to suck...brilliant man that Moore.
 
phins_4_ever said:
Funny that a poll of mostly out of town fans is reversed from local fans. 73% down here want Moore to start. I assume a lot of the 73% actually go to the games and saw what I saw. Open receivers on almost every play.

Edit: and the Miami Herald poll favors Tannehills benching with 67%
Click to expand...

Thing is, the people that watched on TV got a closer view of instant replay, and better views of all the plays on TV, so...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom