Originally posted by ethand420
39: You are a class act... Why are people doubting the patriots saying we are a fluke, a one year wonder? I've read your posts and I think your a class act. Good luck next year!
We may not win the superbowl again, but were going to improve as most teams will. We have great trade bait, are in great salary cap situation.. we have a team that knows and believes in it's system. That is enough for me.. imagine the patriots with another couple receivers? That could be pretty good.. but who knows!
dolfan06 -
Before you disrespect the patriots, do you really think your team could've beaten the steelers or the rams? I'm just wondering. The patriots can beat the dolphins when it counts... see playoff results in the 96-97 and 97-98. The patriots were by far the hardest hitting team this year. You guys are close though... you might find the right recipe this upcoming year. Maybe you guys should try and tank your first few games of the year and then try to build momentum when it counts - going into the playoffs. hahahah
got this off the pats board 39Originally posted by dolphan39
Izzo recovered fumbles on back to back punt returns in that Oak game and then there was the Brady fumble that was not a fumble.
The Pats won because they had all the best players on the field at the end of the season and were relatively healthy and they had a coach that knew how to confuse the opposing team's O.
i know i have, in the playoff game against the black chickens, he didn't draw the safety's up till half way through the 4th quarter!:yell:Originally posted by dofnsman4303
I dont understand how the pats d can go from mid 20 rank in the season to holding the rams to 3 points through 3 quarters. if a game plan can turn their d into such a good squad we need to get rid of bates and find someone who will bring up a safety every once in a while and let the strongest part of our team win games for us.
the pats defense didn't cause some of those turnovers. the INT for a TD was directly caused by the blitz, there were several hits that caused fumbles and faulk was taken out of the game completely. not to mention that warner was on the field, but had no idea what defense the pats were in!Originally posted by Flyin11
the Rams did themselves in...If it wasn't for the turnovers it would have been Rams 17 Pats 3. Plain and simple...The Rams didn't bring their A game and weren't ready to play..The patsies took advantage and controlled the tempo from the first Int on. If the Rams would have given Warner protection and functioned like they had for most of the year...the Patsies would be home right now. That's ok...Time for the Dolphins to take out the Champions 2 times in a row next year :D
I have changed my opinion on Bates - we really do not need to replace Bates - we need Wanne to spend much more time scheming the D and let Norv (I hope) take care of the O by himself.Originally posted by dofnsman4303
I dont understand how the pats d can go from mid 20 rank in the season to holding the rams to 3 points through 3 quarters. if a game plan can turn their d into such a good squad we need to get rid of bates and find someone who will bring up a safety every once in a while and let the strongest part of our team win games for us.