Why don't we just pull Tannehill.
- Thread starter kingfin23
- Start date
Because it does nothing. If he was just playing bat **** poor then sure but let's not completely act like having to pick the ball up off the ground every snap isn't going to mess up the flow either. Moore doing it would just result in turnovers...
At this point I want Moore in so we can tell if he's worth anything.
floriokie
Practice Squad
I think they should let the 2nd and 3rd stringers play.....looks like we are going no where, couldn't hurt...
Not sure if Moore is the same Moore from 2011, but that Matt Moore gives us a better chance to win than Ryan Tannehill does, especially against the division.
Does Moore play defense? I can't remember...
Elle Clouds
Active Roster
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2006
- Messages
- 2,408
- Reaction score
- 852
I don't think Moore is the answer but he may be able to produce more because he is willing to take risk. At this point, I'd hate for him to get in because he may get some unnecessary wins. I rather stick with Tanne and pick top 5.
I'm aware. It'd be more for the ones who think he's better or can do anything.
zach attach
Active Roster
They wont. How embarrassing for the FO to pull the 96 million dollar man.
It's like me ****ting in both of my hands and asking you which one smells better.
We don't pull Tannehill because we were never going to play well this game. Offense, Defense are outcoached, outclassed, out experienced (Injuries) and you want to put our 2nd string QB in with the other 2nd/3rd stringers? It would prove nothing.
---------- Post added at 03:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 PM ----------
The worst performance of the year. Nothing to look forward to other then losing. **** this team. All of them
---------- Post added at 03:53 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:52 PM ----------
The worst performance of the year. Nothing to look forward to other then losing. **** this team. All of them
