FinHopeful
Starter
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2005
- Messages
- 3,395
- Reaction score
- 13
He had 11 receptions in the game, and you think he should not start. I do not get the logic.
Ginn is our most productive WR. He may not be as polished as Bess, but he demands more attention, and he's able to beat good CB's on a consistent basis. I'm not excusing him for his two non-plays on Monday, but he's still the best we have at WR.
I believe that Hartline will overtake Ginn next season. Hartline's size, quickness, and intangibles make me believe he can be a special player. And, if I hear one more poster write him off as another possession WR - in the mold of Camarillo - I'm going to snap.
Why do you think Parcells will not keep Ginn? Is it because YOU think he's soft? Is it because YOU don't like him? Is it because Ginn dropped that potentially game winning touchdown pass?If BP stays, he will not keep Ginn, IMO
force i do not think they will get rid of ginn,no way.his route running looks great.they could get another wr in the draft.maybe the kid from okl st.this would really open up the field,and the running game out of the i formation.we will be in different direction half way through this season,and the starting next season.they would never get rid the only deep threat on the team.even though he is not used that way now.Why do you think Parcells will not keep Ginn? Is it because YOU think he's soft? Is it because YOU don't like him? Is it because Ginn dropped that potentially game winning touchdown pass?
Parcells had two offseasons to get rid of Ginn and has yet to do.
With that said, if Parcells and Company does get rid of Ginn, I will probably be the first to say thank goodness because now we can stop with all these silly threads talking about how much he sucks.
I swear if Ginn has another 11 catch for 100+ yards game Im gonna flip if Sparano allows him back on the team bus. He should be cut on the spot if he produces like that again... :rolleyes2:
How about if he lets another game winner bounce off his hands again?