Why no different angles for the Mathews catch | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Why no different angles for the Mathews catch

I though it was a catch but like another poster said, not to challenge the call was the most frustrating part. The whole game the refs were calling a bad game. Really bad. Not to say they would have won anyway but those calls tend to hurt a so-so team than a power-house team which the Fins are not.
 
Philbin didn't challenge the call for some reason. The game went on. The broadcast isn't going to waste time showing multiple angles of a catch that the coach can't be bothered to challenge. He looked in to me. Big play. No idea why we didn't challenge.
 
I bet if the Pats had he same play they would have looked at more replays. Money!
Mogwai said:
Philbin didn't challenge the call for some reason. The game went on. The broadcast isn't going to waste time showing multiple angles of a catch that the coach can't be bothered to challenge. He looked in to me. Big play. No idea why we didn't challenge.
Click to expand...
 
That's something that always seems to happen with us. I see them show a replay for the other team 12 times from 146 different angles, take an officials T.O., then go to commercial even when it's obvious but when the Dolphins are involved in a questionable call they show one angle a single time then go to the next play.
 
Why weren't we able to stop the run or the blitz in the second half? Why did Tannehill throw an Int when we had a first down, they should have run the ball.
 
Philbin is a joke. Period. You must challenge that call. It was a vital play.
 
It infuriated me to no end we did not challenge this. It was a lot more clear catch than the interception they showed 100 times.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom