Because based on what I've seen, Saban and Linehan went into the season with the philosophy that they would both run their systems (offensive and defensive) without regard for whether we currently have the players who can pull it off.
In other words, they didn't tailor their systems to the players we currently have in an effort to have a winning season. Instead, they "jammed the square peg into the round hole" to determine the personnel changes we would need to make for their systems to work like they should.
Here's what we found out:
The good news is that one "evaluation year" may yield quicker and longer-lasting GOOD results down the line. Had we tailored our systems and gameplanning to the players we have this year, we might've won more games in the short run but fewer in the long run, because we wouldn't have gotten nearly as much information about the changes we would need to make to run our systems like they should be run.
In the end we might've had more of a winning season with a lot less of an idea about how to get the most out of Saban and Linehan's systems in the future. If the coaches' systems, with the players they need to run as full-bore as possible, are going to be what eventually make us a successful team, I think it makes a lot of sense to spend a year figuring out where we need new players to make the systems run like they should.
I think there's a grand scheme here, fellas.
In other words, they didn't tailor their systems to the players we currently have in an effort to have a winning season. Instead, they "jammed the square peg into the round hole" to determine the personnel changes we would need to make for their systems to work like they should.
Here's what we found out:
- We need a new QB
- We need a true #1 WR
- We need offensive linemen who can block better while pulling
- We need a mauler we can run behind routinely on the offensive line
- We need better blitzers
- We need a shut-down corner
- We need better tackling from the CB position
The good news is that one "evaluation year" may yield quicker and longer-lasting GOOD results down the line. Had we tailored our systems and gameplanning to the players we have this year, we might've won more games in the short run but fewer in the long run, because we wouldn't have gotten nearly as much information about the changes we would need to make to run our systems like they should be run.
In the end we might've had more of a winning season with a lot less of an idea about how to get the most out of Saban and Linehan's systems in the future. If the coaches' systems, with the players they need to run as full-bore as possible, are going to be what eventually make us a successful team, I think it makes a lot of sense to spend a year figuring out where we need new players to make the systems run like they should.
I think there's a grand scheme here, fellas.