Since the Pats lost their pick it is like getting the first and last pick of the first round. The only problem I can forsee is that the player selected will want first round money. It might be a good pick to trade down with to fill holes.
With the Pats losing their 1st Round pick it is like we get 2
- Thread starter wlday
- Start date
SabanHater
***** in the House!
it's still considered a 2nd rd pick. That 1st is abolished.
I want to keep the pick. There should be first round talent available there and every year somebody slides to the second round. Trading down is only a good idea in the first round imho.
retired opfinistic
幸灾乐祸
No matter what he wants he'll be a 2nd rounder. We won't pick twice in the first round.
RickyWilliams
It's time to turn this ship around.
We will have to tell him what the Browns told Quinn. I don't care what you thought, or think, you were selected at this point, so you will be paid accordingly.
Alex44
Chicago Bears GM
He will want to be paid like the #32 overall pick, which he will be, and so I have no problem with that.
Whether you call it first or second round, it is the 32nd pick period.
Whether you call it first or second round, it is the 32nd pick period.
And you still gotta make the right pick...
Spray Mucus
Ray Lucas' mom didn't take vitamins
exactly...
I can't see how the fins win the argument with that. I'm sure the players agent will look at what Anthony Gonzo (number 32 in 07' draft) got last year plus a little more...
Just because there isn't a 32nd pick doesn't mean it was skiped over. an invisible player wasn't taken, the Pats aren't gonna sign a contract with a invisible player.
If we keep the #1 overall pick I have a feeling we are gonna have our top two picks be hold outs of some degree, I hope I'm wrong... But I'd have to side with the player on this one wanting #32 over all money.
Fin_Frenzy_84
Starter
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,007
- Reaction score
- 540
They Should lost all of there picks