It's essentially an IQ test and how much it matters to a team depends on how much weight the team puts on the test as well as what position the particular player in question plays. For example: WR's & RB's don't have a whole heck of a lot to think about. They are told to run a particular pattern or hit a particular hole and they generally do that. Once that breaks down, the thinking part of it is gone and instincts and athleticism take over; superior athletes at these positions don't have to score off the charts on an IQ test.
QB's & ILB's on the other hand, are constantly being asked to anaylyze the opposition and make judgement calls based upon what they see. If they have a low IQ and have a difficult time deducing logical situations, then their low scores may cause them to drop based upon the fact that they may not be able to think fast enough to make the proper decisions.
Oddly enough, the highest scorer on this test was a WR which just goes to show that there are exceptions to every rule. His score is more than double that of the mean score and he alone raises the mean by almost an entire point which makes him a serious outlyer (if you've taken statistics you'll know what I'm talking about here.)
Another interesting statistic shown by this particular group of potential draftees, is the fact that by and large, offensive linemen are the smartest groups of players when seperated by position. Guards topped the charts at a mean score of 26.6 while centers and tackles hit at 24.9 and 24.1 respectively. Pretty impressive when you consider the fact that only QB's outdistanced any of the O-linemen and even they couldn't match the guards with a score of 25.8.
Also, according to this test, the dumbest group of players in the draft are the RB's with a mean score of a whopping 17.3! :eek: The only top prospect here with a score even approching respectable is my boy (USC/Pac 10 prospect :up: ) Justin Fargas. Otherwise, the other top dogs (Johnson, Suggs, Smith, McGahee) all scored in the low 20's or below. McGahee must truely be an idiot with a raw score of 12!!!
Anyway, sorry to ramble on for such a long time, this is just really an interesting bit of data for me as I very much enjoy what statistics can tell us sometimes. If any of you have them, I'd love to take a look at some of the past year's Wonderlic scores to see how they stack up to this group's scores.
BTW, great link!! :bravo: