Would corner be more value now than WR?

[Danny]

There's been only 14 corners taken so far but 21 WR's so at this point, should we take a corner over a WR?.....I know the draft was deep on WR's tho and I guess it'll depends on what WR or Corner are on the board.

Ozzy rules!!

 

[OyeDale305]

No we need a Wr asap

 

[electrolyte]

There's been only 14 corners taken so far but 21 WR's so at this point, should we take a corner over a WR?.....I know the draft was deep on WR's tho and I guess it'll depends on what WR or Corner are on the board.

Ozzy rules!!

I think they have to judge which player will make more of an impact. Do not draft based only on need....

We could always fill WR later.

Just remember, the West Coast Offense does not need stud #1 wide receivers. The WCO is based on getting guys open through SCHEMES and plays, not on individual talent.

 

[kvado16]

no

 

[prim3time]

I think they have to judge which player will make more of an impact. Do not draft based only on need....

We could always fill WR later.

Just remember, the West Coast Offense does not need stud #1 wide receivers. The WCO is based on getting guys open through SCHEMES and plays, not on individual talent.

you need a guy to get off the press & don't say roberto wallace.

 

[LVfinfan19]

Dennard is still out there. If he didnt have some issues leading up to the draft then he would have been taken in the 2 or third round. Might be some good value there.

 

[OyeDale305]

I think they have to judge which player will make more of an impact. Do not draft based only on need....

We could always fill WR later.

Just remember, the West Coast Offense does not need stud #1 wide receivers. The WCO is based on getting guys open through SCHEMES and plays, not on individual talent.

okay lets stick to our guys then hopefully wallace and moore will be studs

 

[paul78]

Hartline as a #1 :confused: