Hyde wouldn't be a bad choice, either.
Part of the problem is while Hyde, Anderson and Crowell are decent starting NFL running backs, there are at 10 or more backs in this draft with the potential to reach their level at a much cheaper cost. For example I see a number of mocks having Royce Freeman going anywhere from late round 3 to mid round 5 and he has the potential to be as good or better than Hyde, Anderson or Crowell. Would it make more sense to spend $3 or $4 million per year on a free agent running back and draft a guard or put that money toward a veteran guard and draft a back like Freeman?
I still think DWill should get resigned, he was looking good later in the year
and how is that working out for us? Teams need talent not lack ofI'd prefer an UDFA unless we can sign a guy cheap. Real cheap.
Otherwise grab some fresh legs late in the draft.
I still think DWill should get resigned, he was looking good later in the year
Agreed. D will held out from signing his tender last year if i believe. He thinks he’s worth more than he isHe's virtually the same skillset as Drake though, albeit at a little less...and you'd be spending a lot more money than what we were paying him this past year with a more limited cap. You're better off with either signing an up-gradable guy with a different skillset for a bit more money, like Anderson, or drafting a guy like Walton in the later rounds to pay peanuts to.
and how is that working out for us? Teams need talent not lack of
If we didnt know what we had in Drake I'd agree and probably want to see us grab Hyde or Anderson. But now that we know The Drake, I am not about to spend valuable cap money signing a guy that will split carries with our feature back.
If they come dirt cheap, sure sign one. If not we can just develop a rookie.
Let's infuse talent on the oline or at the LB spots instead.