WR and it’s not even close.
Value is a relative word.
For instance, people will say there is no value in a first round RB despite the fact a top HB is more valuable than a dud at a more important position.
The only picks that have value are the ones that convert into good players. I don't see the picks themselves as having any intrinsic value.
So any position we get a good player at will be fine to me as long as it's a position we need to improve on.
With the disappointing numbers put up by Burks and Bell, Miami might be able to trade down, into the top of round two and get either one?
Honestly, until free agency I have no clue. I wouldn't be shocked if they trade the 29th pick for an established vet at WR or OL, and I'd be fine with that.
As it stands right now three names I see around that area of the draft are Zion Johnson, Jermaine Johnson, and Nakobe Dean. I think if they could walk away with any of those three it's would be great. I am not sure any of them are actually there though at 29.
#29 does have value if someone has slipped and a team wants that fifth year option on that guy. It will all depend on how the draft goes. Every year someone slips and the end of the first round has value, if a target is there.I disagree. #29 ain't getting you much value in trade. I think you still have a much better chance of drafting 1 talented guy than 2 talented guys later with the picks.
We dont need any more 'camp bodies' or 'JAGs'.
Bryce Hall if he's there....If it's not WR Id be shocked.
OT at #29 will wind up another Ugly AF 'Reach'
If you do the draft value Chart math on what Miami gave up you could trade all those picks and get up to the 10-12 area of R1 in this Draft.Assuming you had a willing trade partner of course.Imagine if I said A month ago that Tyreek Hill would be BPA at 29