LtDan
I am a Dan but not a Lt.
keep himstoody24 said:
Booker?
- Thread starter LKAT
- Start date
FinzManiac
Practice Squad
booker isn't going anywhere even for a third rounder. We're talking about a guy who's been to the prowbowl. A guy who had 100 receptions/1071 yds in 2001 and 97 receptions/1189 yds in 2002.
The guy is a legitmet #2 POSSESSION reciever. We're not letting him go. Chambers is a deep threat next year and Booker will be making the tough catches across the middle
The guy is a legitmet #2 POSSESSION reciever. We're not letting him go. Chambers is a deep threat next year and Booker will be making the tough catches across the middle
Minnphin
I need a Mojito
arsenal said:
I agree, we have enough holes as it is. Booker will be a good compliment to CC with some improvement at the QB improvement (internal or otherwise). I wouldn't mind taking a project on the second day at WR, but for the most part I think we'll okay with CC, Booker, Derrius and McMike at TE...especially if we get Ronnie Brown at number 2. Only so many passes to go around.
NYinBostonFin
Playoffs Please!!
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2005
- Messages
- 4,604
- Reaction score
- 47
- Age
- 48
arsenal said:
It was reported that he was so upset about being here he would actually cry himself to sleep some nights. I remember them saying it during the game on Monday night. If he is still not happy being a dolphin than I dont want him here. Thats why I am down on him.
I do think he can be a great #2 receiver us. But I don't like keeping anyone that doesn't want to be here.
Hopefully it was just a Wanny thing and he's over it now.
LtDan
I am a Dan but not a Lt.
NYinBostonFin said:
Jesus dude. His family was still in Chicago at that time and the Bears did him wrong. Has nothing to do with not wanting to be a Dolphin. Get a clue
popularwar
Perennial All-Pro
Nobody would trade for Booker. On the other hand, he's a solid contributor. Why trade a good player for nothing?
nighttrain76
Seasoned Veteran
stoody24 said:
Not damn thing!!!!!!!!:shakeno: :fire:
Brad528
Pro Bowler
I think if we were to draft Edwards he would become our #2 WR if not #1 He might give Chambers a run for his money.
I think we might be suprised at what booker would bring on the trade market, right now on espn they are saying that rod gardner is the hot wr prospect now and he is not quite the receiver that booker is. And several teams are interested in signing him even before they talk to burress
gardner has avg 56 catches per year w/12.7 avg 2004 51 rec
booker has avg 60 catches per year w/12.8 avg 2004 50 rec
Personally i would definitely keep booker i think that the best is yet to come from his production. IMO
gardner has avg 56 catches per year w/12.7 avg 2004 51 rec
booker has avg 60 catches per year w/12.8 avg 2004 50 rec
Personally i would definitely keep booker i think that the best is yet to come from his production. IMO
Agua
Fighting the media, one lie at a time
NYinBostonFin said:
Nahhh... It was that he was crushed about being traded by Chicago where he felt he had made a home for himself with the Bears, missing his family, etc. There was nothing indicating that there was anything more to it than that.
Jimmy James
You sit on a throne of lies!
Agua said:
We can be that team for Booker now, and that's what I think everybody is missing. If we are loyal to Booker, he'll be loyal like that for us.
Charles
Practice Squad
Were gonna land something from Seattle whether its picks or players I dont know but if we trade Pat for a 1st, which he is well worth to Seattle and every1 else but especially Seattle because they face St Louis 2x a year and will need help with a mediocre secondary.