Bring back Booker?

[jhortondj2]

Would rather we take another look at Aromashadu........young with potential...good camp competition!

 

[Dolphan23]

This is why the Bears cut him. From Yahoo Sports:



http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-bearsmoves&prov=ap&type=lgns

So no, no thanks to Marty Booker.

Which is one of the reasons why he was cut in the first place. No need for someone who can play inconsistent and is't a very young receiver at that. He brings experience, however, nothing more he would offer the team.

 

[SabanHater]

no way!

 

[crazyfin]

What no no no no.

 

[X-Pacolypse]

Marty Booker? Hell No!

 

[The_Phish]

He wasn't that good when he was here and just whined and groaned about being traded and having to play in Miami. No thanks.

 

[Bigjbizzle2]

god no he is terrible and he didnt like being a dolphin the first time

 

[Rio]

youth?

 

[2413fanphins]

would rather bring back mark ingram. (at least I think that was his name)

 

[GoonBoss]

Well, you are right about one thing.....He could compete with Wilford. They are comprable talents....Meaning none.

 

[Polk High 4 TD'S]

hell 2 da no!!!

 

[sadetripod]

There is NO WAY Booker would agree to coming back to Miami. Just trust me on that one. I don't have a link, but I remember reading a Sun-Sentinel article that Booker actually cried in his hotel room when traded from the Bears to Miami.

 

[Predaphin]

Marty Booker is a free-agent. I wouldn't mind bringing him in to compete at slot, as a minimum-salaried free-agent. Nice big receiver who breaks tackles. Could compete for a job with Wilford. Any thoughts?

I don't wanna see him cry again.

 

[NYinBostonFin]

Some threads really amaze me......

 

[ryanosaur2000]

Could have put it better myself

I'll pass. He's not a #1, we've got too many #2s as it is now.

I'd rather draft a guy.

Totally agree with you. We already have 2 or 3 guys that can do what Booker does, and they are all younger. I like Booker but, his best days are behind him.