Of course Tannehilli is not elite, he's not even average. He's %*@&ing "BELOW" average!
He's ranked by just about every single pro football writer, evaluator, and fan between 18-22! That's "BELOW" average!
He's really not that good guys, let's hope Gase molds him into something special.
Having been part of a large pro-Tannehill contingent who have been vindicated having fought the good fight, now that fans like you have become far and few between, I sit on the sideline chuckling while much more astute members including but certainly not limited to
@Digital and
@Sons Of Shula continue to eviscerate these spurious contentions. But over that time I've put together my own takes, a few of which I'll share.
First: no matter how you think Tannehill is objectively rated from a career standpoint and specifically by year prior to 2016, if you refuse to acknowledge that over a 7-1 game stretch Tannehill played at a top 10 or even top 8QB level once Gase's system kicked in with a dependable running game, an at least adequate defense the OL was not rated worst or second to worst in the league, it kind of impugns your overall argument as being subjectively agenda-driven.
In a "what have you done for me lately" league, that performance is pretty damn relevant and answered many of the criticisms lodged against him including:
TANNEHILL: DEBUNKING THE NEGATIVE NARRATIVES
[x] Can’t throw deep
[x} Is not clutch
[x] Is not accurate
[x] Can’t put the game on his shoulders
[x] Is not a leader
[x] Can’t beat formidable Defenses
[x] Can’t win without a 200yd or even 100 yd rushing game
[x] Can’t win with a patchwork Offensive Line
[x] Has no pocket presence
[x] Not respected by his teammates
[x} Had no bearing on why Gase selected the Fins
Now let's take a look at his previous years. If you want to point to "scoreboard" as being most important, you have to be impressed by 2016's version. But even even looking back, in '13&'14 despite their relative years of experience, Tannehill won one more game than did Matt Ryan despite Melty having the GOAT TE, 1 very good receiver and one great receiver while Tannehill had none of that and had to contend with the 32nd rated OL. If you want to apply past "scoreboard" to RT, then be consistent givng the likes of Rivers, Luck, Flacco and Ryan demerits when appropriate.
If you are extolling the virtues of Luck who played in a cupcake division, Flacco, Rivers and Ryan over Tannehill in 14 and 15, here's some sobering facts:
2015 PFF QB Rank OL Rank
Tannehill 19 31
Luck 34 15
Rivers 14 32
Ryan 9 4
2014
Tannehill 11 32
Luck 9 17
Rivers 6 29
Ryan 8 26
Now let's take a closer look at the PFF 2014 ratings when Tannehill was supposedly mucking in the mire
Not too shabby, especially vs his peers, was it?
Bottom Line to answer your question: Tannehill despite coaching rushing, OL, and defense took a nice step forward in 14, regressed a little in '15 but still didn't do all that awful despite the above albatrosses around his neck. Before 2016, you could not rate him top 10, but certainly a persuasive argument could be made that he was at the very least a top 18QB.
In 2016, factoring in his entire body of work including unfamiliarity with the system, maybe rank him a top 14-15 QB. During his last half, 7-1 season, a just as compelling case can be made that he was performing at a top 8 level.
Got lots more but this is now probably "sensory overload," so I'll just conclude by thanking you for teeing this up for me :up: