BennySwella
We need better LB's
Would rather have a linebacker, safety, or DE at this position... Slot corners are a "dime" a dozen. If Jarrad Davis is there at this pick... is this too early to take him? I prefer Foster but he will be gone.
Do not know if I agree they are a dime a dozen, but I agree with the statement.Would rather have a linebacker, safety, or DE at this position... Slot corners are a "dime" a dozen. If Jarrad Davis is there at this pick... is this too early to take him? I prefer Foster but he will be gone.
First of all, the stuff ckparrothead wrote sounded logical but it was way over my head.
I'm glad I don't follow the money.
This Gator defensive back, I'm only familiar with him on the surface. Name and frame recognition and not much else. I tape the Florida and Washington State games every week, watching the tape only when those teams lose. Much joy. I'm too busy laughing at the outcome to care too much about the participants.
I do follow the numbers. Something excellent has been going on with that Gator pass defense. I wasn't surprised they swiped two recruits from the Canes at the last second, based on DBU (Defensive Back University) touting. Florida was tied for the national lead in fewest touchdown passes allowed, and the only school with twice as many interceptions as touchdown passes surrendered. Far beyond that, the completion percentage they allowed was the second best of any college team in more than a decade. I'm not sure even the devoted Gator fans are aware of that. The only reason it didn't receive proper publicity was that Michigan this season was that one team that topped them, with a ridiculously stingy 43.5%, or something like that. I posted the specifics on recruiting eve a couple weeks ago on Canes boards when the regulars were too busy mocking Florida as if nothing positive had happened to that program in a decade, and that McElwain was soon to be fired.
I've also figured out why Jabrill Peppers dropped so much recently: Once you win every award you have to start over again.
You think Lippett would be an adequate replacement for Maxwell? I don't agree with this piece of the equation. If you're drafting a CB in the 1st and cutting Maxwell, he has to start on the outside. Lippett would be a nice surprise, but Miami shouldn't count on him. McCain is a better slot CB than Lippett is a boundary CB, and McCain is the better athlete, with higher upside.
If Tabor grades out as your best player on D, I'll never argue with going that route, but I think the front-7 is more top-heavy than the CB group (which looks to have a lot of 1st/2nd RD CB's). If you want a starting LB, you probably have to grab him at 22 or move up from 54. Miami also needs to add legitimate talent to DE. Grabbing Nick Perry would alleviate some of that pressure, but Miami should still prioritize that position. If M. Lattimore is there at 22, that's completely different. He's a star.
1. "You think Lippett would be an adequate replacement for Maxwell?" - Arguably he was the better corner in 2016 already. He had 4 interceptions and 10 passes defensed. Maxwell was better by a discrete amount during an 8-game run. But where was he during the other 9 games? Either sucking far worse than Lippett, or just not available because of an "ankle" which took far longer to heal than anyone on the Dolphins thought it should take (I know that much). Yet Tony Lippett was only in his second year, not just as a pro, but his second year playing defense period. The maddening mistakes we saw Lippett make were easily understood within that context. He blew his perimeter containment? Well, he's still kind of new to defense and you expect that will get better. He bit on a fake? Takes some time. Meanwhile Byron Maxwell's good year really only amounted to a handful of games, and otherwise he was out there getting himself benched for EFFORT issues, sucking badly, or making himself unavailable for games. And I'm supposed to think that guy is definitely an upgrade on a third year Tony Lippett?
2. "If you're drafting a CB in the 1st and cutting Maxwell, he has to start on the outside." - Says who? There's no rule written on a golden tablet. If we drafted a defensive end at 22, how many snaps do you think he would play? I say 700 is the HIGH end of that range. Well, if (insert corner at 22 overall here) were to be taken by us in the 1st round and played at nickel in place of Bobby McCain/Michael Thomas, that's about as many snaps as you could expect from that player. And that's on the LOW end of the range, because he also may WIN the start. You never know.
3. "McCain is a better slot CB than Lippett is a boundary CB" - That may be the case in the future, you never know as Bobby McCain is himself a young corner, but it was not the case in 2016. It looked like it might be the case in preseason, but Bobby McCain was consistently found out on pick routes, and his underneath zone was pretty bad. I think he really only had perhaps one or two good games.
4. As for the structure of the draft I would say that linebacker is top-heavy. Once you get beyond Zach Cunningham (Mike or Will), Reuben Foster (Mike), Jarrad Davis (Mike), Haason Reddick (Stacked Sam or Will), Anthony Walker (Mike or Will), and Alex Anzalone (Stacked Sam or Will)...it starts getting rough unless you're heading in with the knowledge that the guy you are picking is probably not a 1000 snap guy at which point you can take Kendall Beckwith to be a hammer in the middle. Everything else gets really chancy. I'd consider taking shots on the likes of Ben Boulware, Matt Milano, Richie Brown, Duke Riley, or Paul Magloire...but with low expectations. But there could certainly be value to be had at DT beyond the first round, and there will DEFINITELY be value to be had at DE beyond the first round.
It's just going to come down to your grades on the player. I'm saying it's not a good idea to take this stance that says it would be a mistake to take Teez Tabor at 22 overall because we need front-7. I think that's kind of two-dimensional thinking, and it makes some assumptions that aren't necessarily true.
I don't think the point is "about that", I think it's more how the board goes and what's available and who can help us the most at 22. I cringe when I hear the argument about pass rush or lb. when we don't even know who will be available at this point. To me that argument is obtuse at best. I agree with anyone who brings up the "reaching" argument and that is extremely risky. I can even see the team going with an offense of pick if that is the BAP and all the defensive options are previously taken.If we wanted a cheaper alternative to Maxwell we don't have to use our first pick, there will probably still be a handful of good corners sitting there in the 2nd, like Tankersley.