But like anything else, it's garbage in = garbage out.
Yep, just like starting threads on Finheaven on the 4th of July.
But like anything else, it's garbage in = garbage out.
Then it should be easy to find posts by people claiming he is elite, right? I'll hang up and wait.....
Don't hold your breath lol
"Elite qbs produce"
Drew Brees? Last 5 years? Why has there been no mention of this? He's an 'elite qb' why haven't the saints been a top level team as of late?
No sir, there are not plenty. There's barely a few, if any at all. That's also quitean agendaa gap in classifications going from average, and slightly above average, to elite.
Analytics and it's processes are very much subject bias. Many conclusions based on numbers alone are riddled with paradoxes and other errors. Game film analysis is not some wishy-washy process when you understand what you are watching and looking for. Now projecting talent, etc. from tape is laden with opinions and bias, but film doesn't lie.
Don't hold your breath lol
"Elite qbs produce"
Drew Brees? Last 5 years? Why has there been no mention of this? He's an 'elite qb' why haven't the saints been a top level team as of late?
Don't hold your breath lol
"Elite qbs produce"
Drew Brees? Last 5 years? Why has there been no mention of this? He's an 'elite qb' why haven't the saints been a top level team as of late?
Some people will suggest to you that numbers don’t lie. In many cases that proves to be true. Three apples will always be three apples. But in the game of football, numbers in fact do lie, just like everything else.
. . .
In summary: There are 22 variables on each and every play on the football field.
This is the second most true thing i've read in this thread.My question to the OP is what are your intentions here? Always posting anti Tannehill stuff. Do you think you are going to sway votes in favor of your dislike for the guy simply because you bombard the board with anti Tannehill material? What you are doing is crushing your reputation on this message board and, I don't know if you're familiar with message boards, that doesn't usually end well for said person. They either just disappear or often get so consumed with wanting to prove their once sided point that they break forum rules and are suspended. Why don't you try posting some pro Miami Dolphins material for once?
I don't think you watched that full video on DVP vs Landry because he choose Landry over Parker based on the Data( I don't agree with that) and the the Derek Carr video he is 100% I don't believe he is currently a top 5 QB; No he doesn't over rely on YPA per attempt ( I don't know where you got that from) the best QB stats are TD/INt Ratio, QB rating, A/YA , Y/A and Comp% so yards per attempt is 4th. Based on data Y/A is somewhat overrated.
I still think this guy is sourwrong, but he might be Jerry Springer.
Well you definitely sound like you know more about data analysis then the average person but this is little Data and Big Data ( its better if you have both) but when you mention offensive line and TE play, you have to understand how all of that becomes irrelevant with such a Large sample size on QBs, that means QBs who's had bad wrs,OL play,bad coaches,bad defenses, trouble with the law, still all meet the threshold he's looking for ; with all that being said he's still was unwilling to discount Tannehill even though his NFL career has just been average and is reserving judgement for the 2017. (he may be optimistic because of his college production).