So says the whiny clown. You are comic relief and nothing more.
Tannehill on a shorter leash for 2014
- Thread starter Miami 13
- Start date
So says the whiny clown. You are comic relief and nothing more.
I love to deal in reality, I am trying to help you but it's hard to help a guy that calls Ryan a Tannehill a young, more athletic Tom Brady.
---------- Post added at 06:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 PM ----------
you are your crush hoos sure are witty. You guys got me
---------- Post added at 06:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:22 PM ----------
wouldn't you like to know.
hoops
Tua time!
you think you're slick but the scoreboard in the super bowl never required they even remotely abandon the run despite not having much success...denver every time they even threatened they fell on their face...that was the easiest game plan to stick to in league history
Seattle had to score and move the ball in the first half, they weren't doing it w/ Lynch. Wilson was outstanding but b/c he didn't have big #s folks like you think he didn't do anything.
hoops
Tua time!
i sure hope the ownership here isn't that stupid...
We all know Tannehill was saddled with poor coaching in addition to the league's worst OL but thanks for reminding us.
hoops
Tua time!
i watched the game...they kicked fgs on like their first 2 short field possessions...didn't really do anything on o til the 2nd half...that game was all the d...
the game was a done deal when the kick return to start the 2nd half put em up like 30...you think i'm stupid or something...
they do allow fake GM types to spout off nonsense but no they don't pay me.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,026
- Reaction score
- 190
Haha... hope he's not union or we might need to lawyer up.
Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2004
- Messages
- 5,929
- Reaction score
- 11,031
There not...
you do know they kicked a FG on the first one b/c of a terrible call, right? Wilson clearly got the first down and they botched it.
If you don't think Wilson played really well and think Tannehill did this year then I would call that stupidity.
---------- Post added at 06:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:28 PM ----------
but when Mark had Sparano and Chaz Schilens he was supposed to succeed?
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2004
- Messages
- 5,929
- Reaction score
- 11,031
Overtime:lol2:
Just catching up here a couple of responses
#1 When you count actual winning seasons that weren't determined by Messrs Polian and Marvin Lewis (and then the reality o that charity mightily confirmed by Polian when his starters outscored the jets 45-27 in 1.5 games including 24-0 in the last 31 minutes)
buttfumble going 7-7+2***, 11-5, 8-8 and 6-10 actually had 1 winning season and no divisional championships. Over his last 19 games he won 6. How's that "winning" with him as QB? (Don't ask Mike Westhoff if he's not re-employed by the jest cause he'd laugh in your face!)
It's good in a way to see junc trying to use PFF to tell us that our eye test of the fins OL failed. Surely if he's going in that direction now, then hopefully he'll concede at long last that based on PFF's methodologies, buttfumble was even worse than his numbers ranking starting in 09 39th out of 40, 28 out of 37 (so there was a 1 year improvement but not enough to argue that he was anything other than carried by that chain's stronger links on the way to 11-5), back in '11 to being ranked 37th out of 38 and then the year where he supposedly had little help, 32nd out of 34th. So in his last sucky year, his team's inadequacies let him down, eh? Wait! PFF, the methodologies that junc is buying into. In '12, his halcyon year, there actually was more OL pressure but not a terrific amount, yet, as miserable as buttfumble performed under pressure each year, he was ranked as 19 out of 34 most OL-pressurized QB in the league.
Since we like to quote PFF, here are a couple:
and how he performs under that pressure (his adjusted accuracy)? In '12, 34th out of 34th
So junc, next time you want to cite PFF in rebuttal to our OL failing our "eye test," please understand that the same PFF research and methodologies confirm that since 09, while to you buttfumble might have ever been a top 10QB, our eyetest on how horrendous he's always been has been ratified! So thanks for the opportunity to finally lift the clouds (lately hubis) that have been encircling your homervision. Bottom Line: if we're not right about the Fins OL line you're surely not right asserting buttfumble was ever better than a bottom of the barrell QB. :idk:
.
#1 When you count actual winning seasons that weren't determined by Messrs Polian and Marvin Lewis (and then the reality o that charity mightily confirmed by Polian when his starters outscored the jets 45-27 in 1.5 games including 24-0 in the last 31 minutes)
buttfumble going 7-7+2***, 11-5, 8-8 and 6-10 actually had 1 winning season and no divisional championships. Over his last 19 games he won 6. How's that "winning" with him as QB? (Don't ask Mike Westhoff if he's not re-employed by the jest cause he'd laugh in your face!)
It's good in a way to see junc trying to use PFF to tell us that our eye test of the fins OL failed. Surely if he's going in that direction now, then hopefully he'll concede at long last that based on PFF's methodologies, buttfumble was even worse than his numbers ranking starting in 09 39th out of 40, 28 out of 37 (so there was a 1 year improvement but not enough to argue that he was anything other than carried by that chain's stronger links on the way to 11-5), back in '11 to being ranked 37th out of 38 and then the year where he supposedly had little help, 32nd out of 34th. So in his last sucky year, his team's inadequacies let him down, eh? Wait! PFF, the methodologies that junc is buying into. In '12, his halcyon year, there actually was more OL pressure but not a terrific amount, yet, as miserable as buttfumble performed under pressure each year, he was ranked as 19 out of 34 most OL-pressurized QB in the league.
Since we like to quote PFF, here are a couple:
and how he performs under that pressure (his adjusted accuracy)? In '12, 34th out of 34th
So junc, next time you want to cite PFF in rebuttal to our OL failing our "eye test," please understand that the same PFF research and methodologies confirm that since 09, while to you buttfumble might have ever been a top 10QB, our eyetest on how horrendous he's always been has been ratified! So thanks for the opportunity to finally lift the clouds (lately hubis) that have been encircling your homervision. Bottom Line: if we're not right about the Fins OL line you're surely not right asserting buttfumble was ever better than a bottom of the barrell QB. :idk:
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/11/14/mark-buttfumble-the-real-problem/
.