- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Messages
- 4,009
- Reaction score
- 460
I don't like the new rule because the wedge and the wdge-buster were the most violent parts of football and if football all of a sudden becomes tame, its not so fun anymore.
From a player's standpoint, I am glad that injuries are being prevented. From a lower-tier player, they may have just lost out on a job because they were the crazy mother****ers that volunteered to be the wedge buster (by far, the most violent position in football).
I always wanted to try busting the wedge at least once but being that I'm a 270 lb. NT, its unlikely I will ever be able to do it.
Football is not suddenly going to become a tame game. There's plenty of violence to go around -- serious injuries could happen on any play. This just is at attempt to manage the situation most blatantly at risk, imo.
You have to look at the effect of steroids [cough, we all know they're not being used, lol] and body-building techniques, the behind the scenes growth of the game [the unspoken underbelly of all modern sports]. Now it's not unheard of to have 260+ pound players running under 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 and on the kickoff team. Wedges fed into that, without question, but years ago you wouldn't have had the situation.
It's pure physics and the human body can only stand so much.
That's the physical part of it. The game implications of this change might well favor Ginn in the early going of the season. It's going to take teams awhile to adjust to the new rules and if this gives any breakdown or crease to Ginn he'll take advantage of it, imo.
If he's indeed back there on kickoffs. As sexy as kickoff returns are, Ginn is FAR more valuable to this team in the role he plays as leading WR, forcing teams to respect the vertical. All other underneath WRs feed off of Ginn.
LD