Landry also has 400+ catches in 4 years with 22 TDs. Your math level is astounding. That means he caught a touchdown on only 5.5% of his catches. Albert Wilston caught 127 passes with 7 TDs, which means he averages 5.6% touchdowns per reception. We cut half the cost for nearly the same result. In the financial world and on the football field, that's called an upgrade.
You want to be stupid about math, let's be stupid about math.
So cutting half the cost for nearly the same result=upgarde??...well nearly the same result based on TD', so let's use that astounding logic.
Stills 222 receptions and 26 TD's=11.7% TD per reception
Julio Jones 585 reception and 43 TD's=7.3% TD per reception, thus according to your logic in the financial world and on the football field, Kenny Stills is an upgrade because he's cheaper and gets you a better result.
Maybe in your quest to be a math whiz you forgot common sense classes?
Do I think its a bad signing as far as talent? Not really, but it's not a good signing based on the money imo. Especially given the recent roster purge and our cap being crap. Also having Grant who I'm sure can get the same results as Wilson because frankly Wilson's numbers aren't anything special.