Carr is better than Tannehill right now as a rookie with a terrible team compared to a 3rd year quarterback. That's the comparison
What exactly is the proof behind this? It isn't wins b/c Oakland doesn't have any. It isn't completions, yards, or TDs, because Tannehill has more. Carr has less TDs and more INTs.
Granted 3 games is a small sample size and it means nothing but you're the one already comparing the two QBs and saying Carr is better.
So, how?