No that defense led them there. Look now, their defense is not nearly as dominate and they are near implosion.
They had the best defense and best rushing attack. None of that due to Sanchez.
in '09 based on rankings we had the best D and rush attack, in '10 we were nowhere near the best yet won more games and were a better team thanks to mark Sanchez.
With santonio in the lineup they have a better receiving corps then us. Not to mention Keller is way better then fasano.
Sanchez did nothing to win those games. Conversely he did nothing to lose them either so I guess that's something.
Sanchez was excellent in those playoff games outside of the 1st half of the Indy WC game where he would eventually lead the team on a game winning drive as time expired.
Sanchez gets no credit for winning 4 road playoff games but Tannehill gets all the credit for going 2-3 even though he didn't do much in either game.