mrbunglez
TuaInDaPinkUnoInDaStink
Isn’t that what everyone wanted? A more aggressive Tua?
I’m standing firm that Tua had a good game yesterday
Isn’t that what everyone wanted? A more aggressive Tua?
I will take 250 34/17 all day for a 2nd year guy.I wouldn't call it good or bad. It was average in just about every way for the most part.
For a week one game I'm fine with it. If that's the average play we see over the next 16 games though I think we need a new QB.
Isn’t that what everyone wanted? A more aggressive Tua?
Isn’t that what everyone wanted? A more aggressive Tua?
I will take 250 34/17 all day for a 2nd year guy.
You do you though.
I know it’s only 1 game but I think Cannata explained it better.Thanks for posting. It is interesting, but those types of stats really have limited value without a deeper analysis. Without context of situation, the defense being played against, etc, can we really draw conclusions from a 1 game sample size?
Except a chunk of the players throwing for more per game had trash teams and were playing catchup all game like Herbert, Burrow, Watson, Ryan etc. Apparently you equate more ypg as mOrE bEtTeR? Also another 20ypg which isn't going to come against the New England secondary for 17 games would move him up all the way up to 7th ahead of Aaron Rodgers, so let's not pretend like there's some cavern between him and the rest of the lot.250 yards per game would have been good for about 17th in the NFL last year.
A 2-1 TD ratio would have been 19th or so in the league.
Those numbers were great in the early 2000's, they signify trash now.
Isn’t that what everyone wanted? A more aggressive Tua?
50% ? That was good in the 70’s but today you have to be 67% or better.I will take 250 34/17 all day for a 2nd year guy.
You do you though.