Originally posted by Crisdeman
LOL insult, that was barely. You really need to grow some thicker skin if your planning on posting more inflamitory posts based on horribly skewed stats.
I dont believe you have grown past the basics. People dont seem to understand that Fiedler isnt going to win many games on his own, he needs help, hes just not that good.
What perplexes me is that there are much larger and more obvious problems with the defense (no pressure on QB, no turnovers, cant stop drives, etc) yet SOME people use this opportunity to bash Fiedler.
What I want to know is why is there all this talk about fiedler and barely anything about the players that didnt show up at all. Wheres the "Jason Taylor played like @ss" thread, or the "sammy knight blew a huge tackle and gave up a 78 yard pass play" thread.
Actually the stat pointed out exactly what I wanted it to point out. The stat was referencing the Dolphins and Dolphin games.
An average of 28 points would have acquired more than 9 victories last year and 1 last week.Your response was that I was a moron.
You then told me a stat about Tampa and Superbowl winners. Moron?
If you have read page one of this thread or any other post in the thread by me, you might come to the realization that I don't believe Fiedler has to win the game for the Dolphins.
What I believe is that this defense (without the 2 new additions) has not shown the capability to shut down an above average team. So as you so aptly pointed out, 2/3 of the Dolphins money (with Super Bowl as the goal) has been a bad investment. We just added two more free agents to the mix and they still couldn't get the job done Sunday.
Realization=Can't win it with a shut down defense (Tampa).
What I believe is that this offense has shown that it is incapable of a dramatic 4th quarter win or anything resembling "explosivess" with the exception of Ricky Williams breaking one every now and again.
So to cut this short......
Since the money and long term investment is in the Defense and the dolphins are unable to purge that fact. One would think that a change has to be made elsewhere.
Ricky Williams? No, I don't think it's there.
Receivers? Yea, sure I'd take another and I've "picked bones" there.
Offensive line...Sure I've "picked bones" there.
AH.....Quarterback....Yes...The guy who holds the ball on every offensive play...The guy who (if capable) of throwing a "strike"
30 yards downfield to a blanketed receiver keeps defensive coordinators sweating bullets for a week.
The guy who accounts for 3.5 million dollars this year. The guy who could be replaced by another with 1 or 2 million more in salary to acquire the so desperately needed "threat".
The "threat" is all we need. It doesn't even have to be used if it's there. The problem is there is no threat. There is only "pot luck".
Defensive coordinators have been more than willing to roll the dice every week against what we have deemed to be our threat. I'm just tired of the D coordinators rolling the "sevens".
The Jests will probably see the "snake eyes" come sunday.
But will that really give you confidence that come the 21st in Buffalo you will not see "8 in the box" shown on 3rd and 6 yards to go?