NaboCane said:
Halifax, I know why I prefer Alexander, but I'm curious why you think Edge is better?
Why is Edge better?
First off, I'm not meaning to sound arogent, but Edge IS better, I just don't THINK he is. I have no particular reason to choose one over the other for any other reasons other than football reasons.
Ok here's the deal.
I watch every game that Edge plays, as my brother's team is Indy and he pays for the sunday ticket and he owns the big screen. Along with that, I doubt very highly that you watch all of Seattle's games. If you were to (as I assume you do) check the stats as you are watching your game, there are lots of reasons to assume Alexander is the better back. But, watching the games personally a few things would stick out to you. I'll list them
1. Edge is the best blocker in the league amoung running backs.
2. He is a superb passing option, maybe tied for second with Holmes behind LT.
3. He is much more agile than Alexander and has that coveted ability to cutback on his own cutback if that makes sense. (a la Barry Sanders)
4. He gets the "edge" in intelligence largly because he plays with Manning and some must have rubbed off.
5. He is younger than Alexander
6. He doesn't have the fumbling history that Alexander has.
7. He see's the feild better and is able to get his blockers out in front of him 8. He can hit the gaps with power like few can, yet he can also hit the corner and bust it that way.
9. Edge runs behind a pass blocking o-line and doesn't have the run blocking monsters that Seattle has.
In fact, the only advantage for Alexander MIGHT be break away speed but even that is a question mark.
In all, I would be the happiest Dolphan around if we got Alexander for next season. If we cannot get Edge which is a very real possibility, we could have a great shot at alexander, because they are most likely going to Franchise Waltor Jones again.
If they do franchise alexander, then the Dolphins have to persue Jones at all costs.