Jimmy James said:I think it's time for the gloves to come off here.
Both Boston and Booker have been Pro Bowlers. Chambers has not.
Both Boston and Booker have been over the magic 1000 yard mark. Chambers has not.
I really don't buy that Boston is ever going to be anything other than a shadow of his former self, but if he does return to that form, why on Earth wouldn't he be #1 with Booker as #2 and Chambers headed out to the slot?
If it is no insult to Booker to suggest something like that, it certainly shouldn't be an insult to Chambers to put it that way, right?
Don't blame Chambers #'s on him but the previous regime crappy system.