What disappoints me about this article is how much it reads like someone at the national level whose last glimpse of Miami was the KC Playoff game at the end of the '23 season.
Nothing is wrong with the take per se, but the paradigm is 1.5 years out of date and I think most of us understand that change(s) started happening as early as the '24 offseason when the window of '22 - '23 was officially over.
Here at the end of the '25 offseason there's been an entire shift which should continue through '26 and '27.
- You stopped trading away draft picks and stood firm in '24 and '25 drafting developmental BPA picks.
- You added more coaches to the offensive ranks.
- You hired a new DC and have successfully kept him in place for a 2nd year.
- You successfully replaced the Center you lost to career-ending injury.
- You drafted, groomed and are set to insert your new LT who even has some starting experience from '24.
- You've acquired and are set to insert your new LG/RG.
- You've drafted WR & RB talent through the last 2 Drafts to help replace 1st generation starters.
- You signed a QB for '24-'26 because he seemed like the best option over that 3-yr window and you're working thru that.
- You drafted multiple (R1) players along your D-front.
- You brought in new LBs who've been okay.
- You've begun what will eventually turn into a complete rebuild of the secondary.
Talking about the need to do things is fine, but 1.5 years into the evolutionary process, I think the focus should be on the new information we have about where Ross, Grier, McDaniel and Weaver are taking things. We've seen a lot over the last 1.5 years and this is a very new team as a result!
There's plenty to discuss. I don't think legacy media (or Chris Perkins) really want to get into it. Instead, these type of people / outlets lean on the same old tired cliche talking points we heard at the end of '23...McDaniel is too soft, Tua is a stat queen, there's too much DC/scheme turnover, etc.
That national / legacy media guys just get stuck arguing about where things used to be. They don't cover the small things, thus they don't really cover the team at all. They won't have anything to say until long after all these moves have solidified and it's already plain to see what worked and didn't.
They. Are. Reactionary.