Not a fan of the move. The guy has ability, but I just don't see him being better utilized on a snap for snap basis here than he was in New Orleans, and his snap to snap stats in New Orleans weren't that impressive. I still think he's a highlight reel player who's tape falls apart when you look at all of it (say, Jeff George without the character problems, or early career Michael Vick).
At his press conference Bush said he'd always wanted to be used as the feature back and the reason he wanted to come here is because this was his chance to be that. I applaud his confidence in himself and his ambition to be more than he is, but there's a reason the guy wasn't the featured back in New Orleans or at USC, and that's because those coaches know their trade. If they're seriously thinking of giving Reggie Bush the majority of the carries, what they're saying is that they know more about his potential and his abilities than the coaches that have been around him for the last eight years (five in NO, three at USC). They're saying that these people who knew him and worked with him every day (which includes a brilliant, Super Bowl winning offensive mind) didn't know what they had. That they left a dangerous weapon on the sidelines because they didn't know he was a dangerous weapon, didn't know how much pounding he could take.
That, my friends, is the very definition of arrogance.
Now, maybe they really only do want to use Bush like they used him in New Orleans. In that case my question is: who the hell is going to be running the ball the rest of the time? Because even a promising rookie like Shonn Greene -- with a full offseason to get him up to speed -- only carried the ball 108 times as a rookie. Not only that, but you lied to your star acquisition in telling him he was going to be the feature back. And to top it off you didn't bring in anyone else to carry the load he can't carry.
The only way the move fits in logically is if they're going to be some 60-70% pass team like the Eagles. If that's the case -- which it would be an understatement to say that I doubt -- then at least I see the logic of Reggie Bush as a "feature back". But otherwise it remains baffling to me.
But like a lot of things these guys do, sometimes when you can't see a logical reason for what they're doing... it's because they're being stupid.