Some interesting numbers on Mark Royals:
25th-His NFL rank for punting average(40.2yds.) in 2002.
T29th(tied with 2 others)-His NFL rank for longest punt(56yds.) in 2002. He was tied with 2 others, meaning there was only one punter with a shorter amount for longest punt last season in the NFL. It was also his lowest amount of yardage for longest punt of the season since 1991.
31st-His NFL rank for % of punts(21.7) inside the 20. This is allegedly Royals' strong suit, the reason he's supposedly such a good punter, but yet there was only one team with a lower % of punts inside the 20, Cincinnati.
By comparison, Matt Turk in 2001 with the Dolphins was 22nd in the NFL in punting avg.(41.0), 2nd in the NFL in longest punt(77yds.), and 8th in the NFL in percentage of punts inside the 20(34.7).
Why are we supposedly sacrficing boom for directional punting when the numbers show Royals is worse at putting punts inside the 20 than all but one other punter in the NFL last season?
Why is Turk still unemployed and Royals still a Dolphin?:huh: