like i have said before.i cheer for the team first.yes he has not lived up to his draft position but if he can help this TEAM win i want him around
Agree - cheer for the team...this is a TEAM sport. That said...
(and this is not directed specifically at you, silver...just in general)...
IMHO, the statement "x player hasn't lived up to his draft position" has been WAYYYYY overused on this board. LOOK - players get drafted where they do (and are graded as such) by the personnel departments of teams in the league, based on whatever evaulation criteria they use, and what they hope the player can become in that respective system. The players themselves DO NOT and CANNOT CONTROL WHERE THEY ARE DRAFTED (much to the chagrin of some of the posters on this board...again - not talking about you, silver...just in general). It is
completely unfair to run ANY player through the ringer because they're not playing at the level the team HOPES they will play at. Yes - we can all express disappointment when said player doesn't play well, but I just don't think they should be chastised for not living up to their draft position. One only need to reference back to Ronnie Brown...a great running back in college..."worthy" of the #2 overall pick? Who are WE to decide? One just sets themself up for disappointment, OR, one gets to beat on their chest when the player doesn't do well and they call out the GM, etc, for being incompetent...does that make one feel better? Even undrafted players, including rookies on our OWN TEAM, can have good success in this league. How the hell does that happen, Mr. Personnel Guy??
EVERY player has strengths and weaknesses. We often hear coaches offering up the cliche phrase over and over again that it's their job to "put their players in the best positions to succeed...blah, blah, blah." Well - it's time for the coaches to hold up that end of the bargain, or maybe THEY should be the ones with their feet held to the fire. If the player has talent, find out what that talent is and exploit it (does Shula come to mind???). If a particular 'high drafted' player happens to not pan out, who's fault is it? The player, by virtue solely of where they were drafted? I think not. I would view it more as a collective failure of several elements including the player, scheme, coaching, or any number of things which we as non-player-personnel observers can only speculate on.
Of course these are just my opinions. Perhaps there are other who share similar thoughts, or you can just shoot me down. Regardless, let's cheer for the TEAM (thanks again for that, silver), and hope that each individual player does his part, regardless of where he was drafted.
There - I've said my peace.