phunwin said:
No great loss. Reggie was awful last year, and is slated for a pretty decent payday in 2005. I hoped that he could be salvaged this year, but if he's done, he's done.
Im still giving Reggie another year. He was playing out of position last year as a nickelback. Reggie is not a man to man cover corner IMO, I would slate him as more of a zone and off coverage guy and he is an excellent tackler. Poole IMO is more of a press coverage guy, I dont know about him playing zone......
I agree that Reggie RIGHT NOW is overpaid, but if we play more zone defense then Reggie should be worth what we are paying him....... I dont know what Saban's plan for defense is, but we have:
Madison: Good man to man cover corner. Not a good tackler... excellent nudger. I think he has the recovery speed to be good in a zone and Madison has always had great jumps and reads on the ball.
Poole: More of a press man to man corner. I dont think he has the recovery speed that Madison does. Poole is a playmaker but I dont think he is your ideal zone corner CB.
Howard: Excellent tackler. Not a great man to man corner. I wouldnt want him isolated on an island against the other teams #2 WRs. Howard would be a very good zone CB.
So who do we start? If we are playing zone, Madison and Howard. Press its Madison and Poole. I would love to have another guy come in who is like Madison who can be good in a zone AND press coverage scheme. You could disguise your coverage very well if we had 2 guys who can do that... I think Poole is more likely to be able to play both ways than Howard is.... but he isnt the ideal guy.
Daniels comes in competing with Mario Edwards for the dimeback/nickelback position. For once, I have no idea what we do with Poole and Howard. IMO it depends on the coverage scheme we plan on using. Both Daniels and Poole would have adequate size to play FS.... but I dont see either of them floating there. Our secondary is very interesting this year.