Dead Money - $13.136M | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Dead Money - $13.136M

spiketex

Aussie with the swag of El Bravo 47
Super Donator
Club Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
7,451
Location
West Palm Beach, Florida
I was interested to see that the Dolphins are wearing $13.136M in Dead Money towards the cap. Biggest culprits are Brandon Marshall $5.5M, Vernon Carey $4.8M and Yeremiah Bell $1.85M, the others were Tim Dobbins $600K, AJ Edds $238.5K, Matt Roth $123.5K and Frank Kearse $23.576K. (It seems a long time since we said goodbye to Roth)
Granted, if players aren't going to fit, it's better to pull the plug, but it would be nice to have an extra $13M available for a couple of top players. Who has the responsibility for minimizing the deadmoney towards the cap? Is this strictly Ireland or is it a shared responsibility between GM and Head Coach? Welcome thoughts on better ways to minimize the deadmoney...
 
The real reason Matt Flynn wasn't signed in the off season imo...salary cap mismanagement.
 
If they wanted flynn.... really wwanted him they would have signed him. Really not to sad about not getting him. If im not mistaken that $13 mill should come off the books next year, must of it should anyway. So that should give us some extra room to sign long and maybe 1-2 others at decent contracts.
 
The real reason Matt Flynn wasn't signed in the off season imo...salary cap mismanagement.
Doubtful, and you have NO proof of that. Teams always rework other deals to make room for a player they covet. Quite frankly, I think Seattle overpaid him. The Phins were actually the intelligent team in the entire Flynn sweepstakes. They offered him a fair FA contract with the understanding that he might or might not be an upgrade over Moore (a correct assessment IMO).
 
I was interested to see that the Dolphins are wearing $13.136M in Dead Money towards the cap. Biggest culprits are Brandon Marshall $5.5M, Vernon Carey $4.8M and Yeremiah Bell $1.85M, the others were Tim Dobbins $600K, AJ Edds $238.5K, Matt Roth $123.5K and Frank Kearse $23.576K. (It seems a long time since we said goodbye to Roth)
Granted, if players aren't going to fit, it's better to pull the plug, but it would be nice to have an extra $13M available for a couple of top players. Who has the responsibility for minimizing the deadmoney towards the cap? Is this strictly Ireland or is it a shared responsibility between GM and Head Coach? Welcome thoughts on better ways to minimize the deadmoney...

Usually, contracts are the province of the GM and the FO, not the HC. However, I think contract ramifications certainly complicate HC's decisions. I'm sure all teams make compromises on personnel because of it.

The best way to minimize dead money is to front-load rather than back-load contracts. For example, the Bills have made news with two big contracts in the last two years to Ryan Fitzpatrick and Mario Williams. The Bills prefer to front-load their contracts, so Fitzpatrick and Williams will get most of their guaranteed money "up front" in the first and second years of their contracts. The Bills were "lucky" in that they have NOT had many star players they need to pay big contracts to, so writing front-loaded contracts isn't a problem for them -- yet. That may change, however (and hopefully, it does).

Other teams, in order to add more expensive players, sometimes spread the payment of guaranteed money out over several years. This isn't a problem unless the team decides to release/trade that player. Then, any of the guaranteed money that isn't paid yet, counts against the cap in that year.

This is a very simplistic example: a team signs a player and pays him $10 million in guaranteed money plus $2.5 million a year in salary if the player is on the roster on a certain date. The 2.5 million will only count against the cap in the year it's earned. If the $10 million is paid as a signing bonus in the first year, that $10 million can be counted against the cap in that year (I believe that's called "cash to cap" or it can be prorated over the life of the contract. If the play is cut/traded after the first year, the team has possibly only a $2.5 million cap hit in the year the player is cut/traded. If the $10 million were to be spread over the length of the contract, say, $2 million, $4 million, $3 million, $1 million, the player would count only $3.5 million against the cap in year 1, $6.5 million in year 2, etc. If the player was cut/traded after his first year, however, the team would take an $8 million cap hit in the 2nd year -- or have $8 million in dead money.

The Jets have this issue with WR Santonio Holmes. His guaranteed money is spread out over his contract, so it would would cost the Jets over $10 million IIRC to release/trade him, which pretty much explains why he's still on the team despite his antics last season.
 
I was interested to see that the Dolphins are wearing $13.136M in Dead Money towards the cap. Biggest culprits are Brandon Marshall $5.5M, Vernon Carey $4.8M and Yeremiah Bell $1.85M, the others were Tim Dobbins $600K, AJ Edds $238.5K, Matt Roth $123.5K and Frank Kearse $23.576K. (It seems a long time since we said goodbye to Roth)
Granted, if players aren't going to fit, it's better to pull the plug, but it would be nice to have an extra $13M available for a couple of top players. Who has the responsibility for minimizing the deadmoney towards the cap? Is this strictly Ireland or is it a shared responsibility between GM and Head Coach? Welcome thoughts on better ways to minimize the deadmoney...

Dead money on your salary cap is:

A) A direct reflection on your General Manager's decision making
B) A fact of life in the NFL
 
I can't believe people are still whining about Matt Flynn and why he wasn't signed.
I can. you've already got a group whining that tannehill has made multiple probowls and the hof before we even start training camp and now we need to use our first next year on barkley because we're going to be in a position to draft him. nevermind the fact... that we haven't even started ****ing training camp. goddamn.

---------- Post added at 11:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:09 AM ----------

Dead money on your salary cap is:

A) A direct reflection on your General Manager's decision making
B) A fact of life in the NFL
yep. cap space is also a the gm's decision making. thank goodness we've worked the cap to still have room despite the dead cap space.
 
I can. you've already got a group whining that tannehill has made multiple probowls and the hof before we even start training camp and now we need to use our first next year on barkley because we're going to be in a position to draft him. nevermind the fact... that we haven't even started ****ing training camp. goddamn.

---------- Post added at 11:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:09 AM ----------

yep. cap space is also a the gm's decision making. thank goodness we've worked the cap to still have room despite the dead cap space.

Cap space in itself is not a direct reflection on a General Manager's decision making. How your team does during the upcoming season could easily show that perhaps the General Manager should have used that cap space to add more talent.

However, dead cap money is an unqualified negative. It serves no purpose. It should be avoided. Its presence is reflective of some form of mistake, or failure to do all that you could as a General Manager. However, it's a fact of life in today's NFL. Every team has it. There's no way to even put that $13 million into a context, as we don't necessarily know the average around the league.
 
Cap space in itself is not a direct reflection on a General Manager's decision making. How your team does during the upcoming season could easily show that perhaps the General Manager should have used that cap space to add more talent.

However, dead cap money is an unqualified negative. It serves no purpose. It should be avoided. Its presence is reflective of some form of mistake, or failure to do all that you could as a General Manager. However, it's a fact of life in today's NFL. Every team has it. There's no way to even put that $13 million into a context, as we don't necessarily know the average around the league.
I do know that we resigned carey and bell after the 2008 season...

http://blogs.nfl.com/2009/02/20/dolphins-re-sign-tackle-carey/

which after the record we had in 2008 it made sense to lock both of them up long term, not surprising that we'd dump them when they didnt' live up to thier contracts.
 
so does thes money disappear next off season? Roth seems to be hurting us still. Will the Marshall and Carey/Bell $$$ be back in our pockets after this season?
 
Thank god for that, he's being beaten in camp by Jackson and Wilson.

Interesting...

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seahawks/2018281722_hawk25.html

---------- Post added at 02:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:16 PM ----------

I can't believe people are still whining about Matt Flynn and why he wasn't signed.
Are you sure you understand the difference between simply stating an opinion and whining?

Rhetorical
 
Back
Top Bottom